期刊文献+

城乡教育一体化进程中农村义务教育教师质量问题与对策 被引量:16

Questions and Countermeasures of Rural Teacher Quality in the Compulsory Education in the Process of the Integration of Urban and Rural Education
原文传递
导出
摘要 农村义务教育教师质量是缩小城乡义务教育差距,建立城乡教育一体化发展机制必须面对的现实课题。推动城乡教育一体化必须正确认识目前农村义务教育教师质量方面的专业资本困境、教学有效性困境、发展动力自限困境等问题,通过强化省域农村偏向的教师征聘培养模式,选择包容性教师配置,为农村教师提供关键职业支助,实施多元主体监控农村教师质量等策略,探索农村教师质量提升路径,有效促进义务教育均衡发展。 The rural teacher quality in the compulsory education is a reality topic that we must face during narrowing the gap between urban and rural compulsory education, and establishing the development mechanism of the integration of urban and rural education. To promote the integration of urban and rural education, we must correctly recognize the dilemma of professional capital, teaching effectiveness, development power self-limiting in the rural teacher quality in the compulsory education currently. By these strategies that to strengthen the teachers recruitment training model of provincial rural areas tend, select the inclusive teacher configuration, provide critical professional support for rural teachers, monitor the quality of rural teachers by multiple subjects to breakthrough the dilemma of the rural teachers" quality, to explore the upgrade path of rural teachers quality, and effectively promote the balanced development of compulsory.
作者 张宇 于海英
出处 《教育发展研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第24期70-73,共4页 Research in Educational Development
基金 全国教育科学"十二五"规划2011年度教育部重点课题(DIA110261)部分研究成果
关键词 城乡教育一体化 农村义务教育教师质量 the integration of urban and rural education, rural teacher quality in the compulsory education, dilemma, upgrade path
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献42

  • 1李琼,倪玉菁.从知识观的转型看教师专业发展的角色之嬗变[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2004,22(4):31-37. 被引量:51
  • 2王文岚,尹弘飚.课程改革中的教师专业发展:取向与策略[J].江西教育科研,2007(2):85-88. 被引量:3
  • 3秦玉友.农村教师素质提升的现实困境与破解思路.教育研究,2008,(3).
  • 4Terri Duggan Schwartzbeck,Cynthia D. Price,Doris Redfield, Helen Morris, & Patricia Cahape Hammer. How Are Rural School Districts Meeting the Teacher Quality Requirements of No Child Left Behind?[R]. American Association of School Administrator & Appalachia Educational Laboratory, 2003.
  • 5Levin, H. (1998). Education and the ability to deal with change. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Educational Research, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
  • 6Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluatio, Gullickson, A. R., & American Association of School Administrators. (2003). The student evaluation standards : How to irnprove evaluations of students. Thousand Oaks, Calif. : Corwin Prcss, Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (20(17). Evaluation: the theory, models & applications. Jossey Bass.
  • 7Fullan,M.,&Hargreaves,A.(1992).Understanding teacher development.London:Cassell.
  • 8Garcia, G. E. & Pearson, P. D. (1994). Assessment and diversity. In L. Darling Hommond (Ed.) Review of research in education, Issue 20 (pp. 337-391 ). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
  • 9Levine, T. (2002). Stability and change in curriculum evaluation. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 28( 1 ), 1 - 33.
  • 10Gpps, C. V. (1994). Beyond testing: towards a theory of educational assessment. London: The Falmer Press.

共引文献46

同被引文献176

引证文献16

二级引证文献90

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部