期刊文献+

两孔法与三孔法腹腔镜胆囊切除术的效果比较 被引量:2

暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的比较两孔法与三孔法腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的临床效果,研究临床应用两孔法腹腔镜胆囊切除术的可行性。方法选取胆囊切除患者按照手术方式分为两孔法腹腔镜胆囊切除组(200例)和三孔法腹腔镜胆囊切除组(156例),比较两组患者的临床疗效和并发症发生情况。结果两组患者手术均顺利成功,其中,两孔法腹腔镜胆囊切除组患者的手术切口长度、出血量、手术时间及住院时间均低于三孔法腹腔镜胆囊切除组患者,且差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);此外,其并发症发生率也明显低于三孔法腹腔镜胆囊切除组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论两孔法腹腔镜胆囊切除术的临床疗效明显优于三孔法腹腔镜胆囊切除术,它具有创伤小、出血量小、手术及住院时间短、并发症少、痛苦少、安全性高和疗效佳等特点。
作者 倪祥金
出处 《中国卫生产业》 2012年第31期161-162,共2页 China Health Industry
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献34

共引文献49

同被引文献24

  • 1Dural R, Biradhar D, Ng PC. Two port laparoseopic-assisted re- moval of a migrating rectal foreign body [ J ]. Tech Coloproctol, 2010,14(3) :263-264.
  • 2Celalettin Vatansev, Gurcan simsek,Tevfik Kucukkartallar. Single Incision LaparoscopieAppendectomy with Two Port : A Case of Ap- pendiceal Mucocele [ J ]. Indian J Surg, 2013, 75 ( Suppl 1 ) : S382-S384.
  • 3Sharaf MF, Abou-Elfotoh I, El-Dakdouky M, et al. Studies on two- port laparoseopic choleeystectomy [ J ]. J Egypt Soc Parasitol,2012, 42( 1 ) :239-243.
  • 4DeBrakeleer DJ. Two Port Laparoscopic Saerocolpopexy Utilizing a Multi-Channel Single Port[ J ]. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gy- necology,2011,18 (6) : 205-206.
  • 5Mehrotra PK, Ramaehandran CS, Arora V. Two port laparoscopic ventral hernia mesh repair: an innovative technical advancement [J]. Int J Surg,2011,9( 1 ) :79-82.
  • 6Tian MG, Zhang PJ, Yang Y, et al. Two-port laparoscopic chole- cystectomy with modified suture retraction of the fundus : A practi- cal approach [ J]. Joumal of minimal access surgery, 2013, 9 (3) : 122.
  • 7Zhang L,Sah B,Ma J, et al. A prospective, randomized, controlled, trial comparing occult-scar incision laparo- scopic cholecystectomy and classic three-port laparoscop- ic cholecystectomy:-J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2014,28 (4) : 1131-1135.
  • 8Shimura T, Suehiro T, Suzuki et al. Laparoscopie chole- cystectomy using a novel two-port technique for surgical residency training[J]. International surgery, 2009,94 (2) 149-153.
  • 9Pisanu A,Reccia I,Porceddu G, et al. Meta-analysis of prospective randomized studies comparing single-incision laparoseopic eholecystectomy (SILC) and conventional multiport laparoscopic choleeysteetomy (CMLC) [J :. J Gastrointest Surg, 2012,16(9) .. 1790-1801.
  • 10严立俊.改良二孔法与三孔法腹腔镜胆囊切除术的对比研究[J].中国普通外科杂志,2009,18(2):200-201. 被引量:9

引证文献2

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部