期刊文献+

腹腔镜与开腹胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的临床效果观察 被引量:24

Clinical investigation of laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy in treating patients with acute cholecystitis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨急性胆囊炎患者采用腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)与开腹胆囊切除术(OC)治疗的临床效果及安全性。方法回顾性分析2012年8月至2014年6月收治的84例急性胆囊炎患者的病例资料,根据手术方式分为LC组(47例)、OC组(37例),观察并记录两组患者的术中术后情况,所有数据在SPSS10.0中进行统计分析,手术时间、术中出血量、胃肠减压时间、术后排气时间、住院时间等计量资料以(x珋±s)表示,采用两样本独立t检验;术后并发症发生率、术后镇痛剂使用情况采用卡方检验,P<0.05表示差异具有统计学意义。结果 LC组患者的手术时间(44.6±11.4)min、术中出血量(65.8±12.5)ml、胃肠减压时间(2.2±0.5)d、术后排气时间(1.2±0.6)d、术后镇痛剂使用率31.91%(15/47)、住院时间(4.2±1.6)d均显著小于OC组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者均未发生死亡病例,LC组术后并发症发生率14.89%(7/47)低于OC组的16.22%(6/37),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论急性胆囊炎患者采用LC手术进行治疗可以减小对患者的创伤、缩短恢复时间,同时不会增加术后并发症的发生率。 Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and open choleeystectomy (OC) in treating patients with acute eholeeystitis. Methods From August 2012 to June 2014, clinical data of 84 patients with acute cholecystitis were analyzed retrospectively. In these patients, 47 patients were allocated in the LC group and 37 in the OC group. Statistical analysis was performed by using SPSS10. 0 software. Measurement data were expressed as mean ±SD , and two independent sample t tests were performed for operation time, intraoperative blood loss, gastrointestinal decompression time, postoperative exhausting time, and hospital stay. Postoperative complications and analgesic use were compared by using the Chi-square test. P 〈 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results The operation time in the LC group was (44.6 ±11.4) minutes, the amount of bleeding during operation was (65.8 ± 12.5 ) ml, the time of gastrointestinal decompression was (2.2 ± 0.5 ) days, the time of postoperative exhaustion was ( 1.2 ±0.6) days, the rate of postoperative analgesia was 31.91% ( 15/ 47 ) , the time of hospitalization was ( 4.2±1.6 ) days ; all of these values were significantly lower than those in the OC group ( P 〈 0.05 ). No death occurred. In the LC group, the postoperative complication rate was 14.89% (7/47) , which was lower than 16.22% (6/37) in the OC group ( P 〉 0. 05 ). Conclusion LC operation for patients with acute cholecystitis could reduce injuries to patients, shorten the time of their recovery, and minimize postoperative complications.
出处 《中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)》 2015年第5期39-41,共3页 Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition)
关键词 胆囊炎 急性 胆囊切除术 腹腔镜 胆囊切除术 对比研究 Cholecystitis, acute Cholecystectomy, laparoscopie Cholecystitis Comparative study
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献76

共引文献361

同被引文献198

  • 1吴一飞,尹新明.吸引器刮吸解剖胆囊三角在急性胆囊炎腹腔镜手术中的应用价值[J].世界临床医学,2017,11(4):71-71. 被引量:4
  • 2Yuan Cheng,Ze-Sheng Jiang,Xiao-Ping Xu,Zhi Zhang,Ting-Cheng Xu,Chen-Jie Zhou,Jia-Sheng Qin,Guo-lin He,Yi Gao,Ming-Xin Pan.Laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy vs three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A large-scale retrospective study[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2013,19(26):4209-4213. 被引量:8
  • 3黄志强.当今胆道外科的发展与方向[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(23):1585-1586. 被引量:91
  • 4张成武,赵大建,邹寿椿,胡智明,吴伟顶,叶再元.急性结石性胆囊炎腹腔镜手术时机及中转开腹影响因素的探讨[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2006,12(12):821-824. 被引量:97
  • 5Pavlidis TE, Marakis GN, Symeonidis N, et al. Considerations concerning lapat~scopic cholecystectomy in the extremely elderly [J], J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A,2008,18( 1 ) :56-60.
  • 6Tucker J J, Yanagawa F, Grim R, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystee- tomy is safe but underused in the elderly[ J]. Am Surg,2011,77 (8) :1014-1020.
  • 7Fuks D, Duhaut P, Mauvais F, et al. A retrospective comparison of older and younger adults undergoing early laparoscopic cholecys- tectomy for mild to moderate calculous cholecystitis [ J ]. J Am Geriatr Soc,2015,63 ( 5 ) : 1010-1016.
  • 8Haltmeier T, Benjamin E, Inaba K, et al. Early versus delayed same-admission laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in elderly patients with comorbidities [ J ]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg,2015,78(4) :801-807.
  • 9Lee SI, Na BG, Yoo YS, et al. Clinical outcome for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in extremely elderly patients [ J 1. Ann Stag Treat Res,2015,88(3) :145-151.
  • 10Riall TS, Adhikari D, Parmar AD, et al. The risk paradox: use of elective eholeeysteetomy in older patients is independent of their risk of developing complications [J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2015,220 (4) :682-690.

引证文献24

二级引证文献190

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部