社会性科学议题在物理教学中的运用被引量：5

下载PDF

导出

摘要社会性科学议题在物理教学中有助于学生理解物理概念,发展非形式推理能力。此外,社会性科学议题也是实施科学、技术、社会、环境关系教育(STSE)的一种手段,可以帮助学生正确认识科学、技术对个人与社会的影响。

作者季薛庆季庆燕

机构地区浙江省泰顺县第四中学

出处《教育导刊（上半月）》 2012年第11期81-83,共3页 Journal of Educational Development

基金 2012年度浙江省中小学教育研究重点规划课题"社会性科学议题情境中科学本质教学实证研究"(编号:033091)成果之一

关键词社会性科学议题非形式推理物理概念STSE

分类号 G633.7 [文化科学—教育学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献8

1John Seely Brown, Allan Collins, Paul Duguid. Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning [J] . Educational Researcher, 1989, 18 (1): 32-42.
2Zohar, A. & Nemet, F. Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics [J]. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2002, 39, : 35 - 62.
3张奇,张黎.SSI课程与学生非形式推理能力的培养[J].华东师范大学学报（教育科学版）,2007,25(2):59-64. 被引量：14
4Linda S. Gottfredson. Dissecting practical intelligence theo- ry: Its claims and evidence [J].Intelligence, 2003, 31: 343 - 397.
5Mustafa Sami Topcu, Troy D. Sadler and Ozgul Yilmaz- Tuzun. Preservice Science Teachers' Informal Reasoning about Socio- scientific Issues: The influence of issue context [ J] . International Journal of Science Education, 2010, 32: 2475-2495.
6中华人民共和国教育部.义务教育物理课程标准[S].北京师范大学大学出版社,2011:7.
7Sadler, T. D., Zeidler, D.L., & Chambers, F.W. Student conceptualisations of the nature of science in response to a socioscien- tific issue. International Journal of Science Education , 2004, 26: 387 - 409.
8Hongming Ma. Chinese Secondary School Science Teachers' Understanding of the Nature of Science--Emerging from Their Views of Nature [J] . Research in Science Education, 2009 39:701 - 724.

二级参考文献25

1Driver, R. Newton , P. Osborne, J. (2002). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84:287 - 312.
2KolstΦ, S. D. (2001a) Scientific literacy for citizenship: tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85 : 291 - 310.
3Zeidler, D. L. (1984). Moral issues and social policy in science education: closing the literacy gap. Science Education, 68:411-419.
4Kuhn, D. (1993). Science as argument: implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77: 319-337.
5Sadler, T. D, Zeidler, D. L. (2004). Patten of informal reasoning in the context of socioseientifie decision - making. Annual Meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers of Science, Nashville.
6Perkins, D. N, (1985). Post-prlmary education has little impact upon informal reasoning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77:562-571.
7Zohas, A. Nemet F. (2002). Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39:35-62.
8Patronis, T, Potari, D, Spiliotopoulou, V. (1999). Students' arugumentation in decision - making on a socio - scientific issue: implications for teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 21 : 745 - 754.
9Aikenhead, G, (2004). What is STS in science teaching? . In: D. L. Zeidler, T D.Sadler Beyond STS: A research- based framework for socioscientific issues education. Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Vancouver.
10Geddis, A. N. (1991). Improving the quality of science classroom discourse on controversial issues. Science Education, 75 (2): 169- 183.