期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

卵泡输出率与体外受精-胚胎移植中卵巢反应性的研究 被引量：6

Study on the follicular output rate and ovarian response in the IVF-ET patients
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨卵泡输出率(FORT)对实施体外受精-胚胎移植(IVF-ET)患者卵巢反应性及妊娠结局的预测效力。方法按FORT值将200个IVF-ET患者分为高、低2组,回顾性分析2组间控制性超排卵数据及实验室指标。结果高FORT值组降调后窦卵泡数少于低FORT值组[(10.9±3.5)与(11.1±6.2)个,P<0.001],而HCG日E2水平明显高于低FORT值组[(2 701.2±102)与(2 183±86)pg/ml,P<0.001)],但2组间基础FSH及E2水平、促性腺激素总量及排卵前卵泡数差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。高FORT值组获卵数(11.8±0.6)与(8.6±0.4)个;MⅡ卵数(10.0±0.6)与(7.4±0.4)个;可移植胚胎数(7.4±0.4)与(5.7±0.3)个;胚胎种植率37.7%与23.3%;临床妊娠率62.8%与33.8%,均高于低FORT值组(P<0.05)。结论 FORT可有效地预测IVF-ET过程中卵巢的反应性,高FORT值患者将具有更好的妊娠结局。 Objective To evaluate if the follicular output rate （FORT） is an effective parameter for predicting the ovarian response in IVF - ET. Methods 200 IVF - ET patients were divided into two groups according to their FORT. The parameters of the controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and IVF - ET between these two groups were retrospectively analyzed. Results The antral follicle count of the high FORT group after pituitary desensitization was less than the low FORT group （ 10.9 ± 3.5 vs. 11.1± 6.2,P 〈0. 001 ）. However, the concentration of serum E2 on the day of HCG was significantly higher in the high FORT group （2701.2 ± 102 vs. 2183± 86, P 〈0.1301 ）. There were no differences about the basal FSH, basal E2, the total gonadotropin dosage and the preovulatory follicle count （ all P 〉0. 05 ） between two groups. The oocytes retrieved number （ 11.8±0. 6 vs. 8.6 ±0. 4, P 〈 0. 001 ）, M 11 oocytes number （ 10.0 ± 0.6 vs. 7.4 ±0. 4, P 〈 0. 001 ）, embryos obtained number （7.4 ±0. 4 vs. 5.7 vs 0.3, P 〈 0. 002）, the embryo implantation rate （37.7% vs. 23.3% , P 〈0. 004） and clinical pregnancy rate （62.8% vs. 33.8% , P 〈 0. 004） were remarkably higher in the high FORT group. Conclusion The study suggests that FORT may be a qualitative reflector of ovarian follicular competence and ovarian response. IVF -ET candidates with moderately high FORT may have more chances for pregnancy.
作者 梅巳 徐仙 刘春莲 赵君利 胡蓉 马小红 哈灵侠
机构地区 宁夏医科大学 宁夏医科大学总医院生殖医学中心
出处 《宁夏医学杂志》 CAS 2012年第9期839-841,共3页 Ningxia Medical Journal
关键词 卵泡输出率 卵巢反应性 控制性超排卵 窦卵泡 体外受精-胚胎移植 Follicular output rate （FORT） Ovarian response Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation （COH） Antral follicle In vitro fertilization - embryo transfer （ IVF - ET）
分类号 R714.8 [医药卫生—妇产科学]
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Genro VK,Grynberg M,Scheffer JB,et al. Serum anti - Mullerianhormone levels are negatively related to follicular output rate(FORT) in normo - cycling women undergoing controlled ovarianhyperstimulation[J]. Hum Reprod,2011,26(3) :671 -677.
  • 2Callot V,Berwanger AL,Genro V,et al. Antral follicle responsivenessto follicle - stimulating hormone administration assessed by the follicu-lar output rate ( FORT) may predict in vitro fertilization - embryotransfer outcome[ J ]. Hum Reprod ,2012,27 (4) :1066 -1072.
  • 3Tolikas A, Tsakos E, Gerou S, et al. Anti - Mullerian Hormone(AMH) levels in serum and follicular fluid as predictors of ovarianresponse in stimulated ( IVF and ICSI) cycles [ J ] . Hum Fertil,2011,14(4):246 -253.
  • 4La marca A,Sighinolfi G’Radi D,et al. Anti - Mullerian hormone(AMH) as a predictive marker in assisted reproductive technology(ART)[J]. Hum Reprod,2010,16(2) :113 - 130.
  • 5Melo MA,Garrido N,Alvarez C,et al. Antral follicle count(AFC)canbe used in the prediction of ovarian response but cannot predict the oo-cyte/embryo quality or the in vitro fertilization outcome in an egg dona-tion prc^ram[J]. Fertil Steril,2009,91 (1) : 148 -156.
  • 6赵旭,刘平.预测卵巢反应性的相关因素分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2009,24(8):1092-1094. 被引量：7
  • 7Carrera J,Estrada L,Sarquella J. Prediction of pregnancy in IVFcycles on the fourth day of ovarian stimulation[ J]. J Assist ReprodGenet,2007,24(9) :387 -394.
  • 8Ottosen LD,Kesmodel U,Hindkjaer J,et al. Pregnancy predictionmodels and eSET criteria for IVF patients - do we need more infor-mation [J ] . J Assist Reprod Genet, 2007 ,24 ( 1 ) :29 - 36.
  • 9梁晓燕.评估控制性卵巢刺激中预测卵巢反应性的指标[J].生殖医学杂志,2007,16(5):300-302. 被引量：7
  • 10Klinkert ER,Broekmans FJ,Looman CW,et al. The antral folliclecount is a better marker than basal follicle - stimulating hormonefor the selection of older patients with acceptable pregnancy pros-pects after in vitro fertilization[ J] . Fertil Steril,2005 ,83(3) :811-814.

二级参考文献33

  • 1魏志新,张丽珠,李美芝,杨池荪,秦莉,刘平,王振红,赵一鸣.卵巢基础状态对促超排卵结局的预测[J].中华妇产科杂志,1997,32(1):27-30. 被引量：19
  • 2Frandstrom M, Akerlof E, Sjoblom P, Hillensjo T. Serum levels of luteinizing and follicle - stimulating hormones in normal and poor responding patients undergoing ovarian stimulation with urofollitropin after pituitary down regulation [J] . Gy. Endocrinol, 1997, 11 : 25.
  • 3Raga F, Bonilla - Musoles F, Casan EM, Bonilla F. Recmnbinant follicle stimulating hormone stimulation in poor responders with normal basal concentrations of follicle stimulating hormone and oestradiol: improved reproductive outcome [J]. Hum Reprod, 1999, 14:1431.
  • 4Land J, Yarmolinskaya M, Dumoulin J, Evers J. High - dose human menopausal gonadotropin stimulation in poor responders does not improve in vitro fertilization outcome [J] . Fertil Steril, 1996, 65:961.
  • 5Rombauts L, Suikkari A. Maclachlan V et al. Recruitment of follicles by recombinant human follicle - stimulating hormone commencing in the luteal phase of the ovarian cycle [J] . Fertil Steril, 1998, 69:665.
  • 6Chong A, Rafael R, Forte C. Influence of weight in the induction of ovulation with human menopausal gonadotropin and human chorionic gonadotropin [J] . Fertil Steril, 1986, 46:599.
  • 7Lindheim S, Barad D, Witt B, Ditkoff E, Sauer M. Short - term gonadotrpin suppression with oral contraceptives benefits poor responders prior to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation [ J ]. J Assist Reprod Genet, 1996, 9:745.
  • 8Feldberg D, Farhi J. Ashkenazi J, Dicker D, Shalev J, Ben Rafael Z Minidose gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist is the treatment of choice in poor responders with high follicle - stimulating hormone levels [J] . Fertil Steril, 1994, 62:343.
  • 9Lass A. Assessment of ovarian reset're - is there a role for ovarian biopsy [J] . Hum Reprod, 2001, 16 (6): 1055.
  • 10Watt AR, Legedza AT, Ginsburg ES et al. The prognostic value of age and follicle - stimulating hormone levels in women over forty years of age undergoing in vitro fertilization [ J ] . J Assist Reprod Genet, 2000, 17 (5): 264.

共引文献20

同被引文献65

  • 1Genro VK,Grynberg M,Seheffer JB,et al. Serum anti- mullerian hormone levels are negatively related to follicu- lar output rate(FORT) in normo-cycling women undergo- ing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation[J]. Hum Reprod, 2011,26(3) :671-677.
  • 2Gallot V,Berwanger AL,Genre V,et al. Antral follicle responsiveness to follicle-stimulating hormone administra- tion assessed by the follieular output rate (FORT)may predict in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer outcome [J]. Hum Reprod, 2012,27 (4) : 1066-1072.
  • 3Zhang N,Hao CF,Zhuang LL,et al. Prediction of IVF/ ICSt outcome based on the follicular output rate [J]. Re- prod Biomed Online,2013,27(2) : 147-153.
  • 4Shima K, Kitayama S,Nakano R. Gonadotropin binding sites in human ovarian follicles and corpora lutea during the menstrual cycle [J]. Obstet Gynecol 1987,69 (5): 800-806.
  • 5Gougeon A. Regulation of ovarian follicular development in primates:facts and hypotheses [J]. Endocr Rev, 1996, 17(2):121-155.
  • 6Jurema MW,Bracero NJ,Garcia JE. Fine tuning cycle day 3 hormonal assessment of ovarian reserve improves in vitro fertilization outcome in gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cycles[J]. Fertil Steril,2003,80(5) : 1156-1161.
  • 7Bancsi LF, Broekmans FJ, Mol BW,et al. Performance of basal follicle-stimulating hormone in the prediction of poor ovarian response and failure to become pregnant af- ter in vitro fertilization:a meta-analysis [J]. Fertil Steril, 2003,79(5) : 1091-100.
  • 8Bancsi LF,Broekmans FJ,Looman CW,et al. Predicting poor ovarian response in IVF:use of repeat basal FSH measurement [ J ]. J Reprod Med, 2004,49 (3) : 187-194.
  • 9Broer SL,Mol BW, Hendriks D, et al. The role of antim- ullerian hormone in prediction of outcome after IVF: comparison with the antral follicle count[J]. Fertil Steril, 2009,91(3) :705-714.
  • 10Melo MA,Garrido N,Alvarez C,et al. Antral follicle count (AFC) can be used in the prediction of ovarian response but cannot predict the oocyte/embryo quality or the in vitro fertilization outcome in an egg donation pro- gram [J]. Fertil Steril, 2009,91 ( 1 ) : 148-156.

引证文献6

二级引证文献32

宁夏医学杂志
2012年 第9期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部