期刊文献+

三学科课程标准中的科学探究:思考与建议 被引量:5

Scientific Inquiry in Curriculum Standards of Physics,Chemistry and Biology:Thoughts and Suggestions
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 科学探究是科学教育的核心内容,也是我国义务教育阶段物理、化学和生物课程标准中的共同部分。2011年版课程标准同实验稿课程标准相比,科学探究内容主要有以下变化:强调科学探究学习的“应然”价值;注重学生创新精神和实践能力的培养;修改了一些易造成教育工作者片面性理解的表述。但三学科课程标准对科学探究内涵的阐述不同、科学探究所包含的二级主题不同。课标中的重要术语及基本观点应有统一和明确的界定;科学探究应注意学科间的一致性、学段问的连贯性。 As the core of science education, scientific inquiry is the common part of compulsory education curriculum standards of physics, chemistry, and biology. Compared with the content about scientific inquiry in the experimental edition of curriculum standards of the three subjects, there are some changes in the 2011 edition. Firstly, 2011 edition puts more emphasis on the ontological value of scientific inquiry learning; secondly, it pays more attention to the cultivation of students' innovative spirit and practical ability~ thirdly, it has modified some statements that could lead to educators' one- side understanding, However, the description of scientific inquiry and the secondary themes included in the curriculum standards of the three subjects are different. Based on this study, it is suggested that the important terms and basic concepts should be defined clearly and consistently. In addition, we should also strengthen the consistency and the coherence of scientific inquiry between different subjects and different learning periods.
出处 《课程·教材·教法》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第9期94-100,共7页 Curriculum,Teaching Material and Method
基金 国家科技部科技基础性专项重大项目“中小学科学探究学习与创新人才培养机制实验研究”(项目批号:2009IM010300) 陕西省教育科学“十一五”规划2010年度专项课题“生物探究式教学评价体系研究”(课题编号:SGH10032)的成果之一
关键词 义务教育 课程标准 科学探究 compulsory educatiov curriculum standards scientific inquiry
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献41

  • 1[美]国家研究理事会.科学探究与国家科学教育标准[M].罗星凯,等译.北京:科学普及出版社,2004:15-18.
  • 2National Research Council. National Science Education Stand ards. Washington, D. C. : National Academy Press. 1995 121-176.
  • 3Sandoval, W. A. ( 2005 ). Understanding students' practical epistemologies and their influence on learn ing through inquiry. Science Education, 89, 634- 656.
  • 4Macaroglu, E. (1999). Pre-service elementary teachers' understanding nf scientific inquiry and its role in school science. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsyl vania stale university, State College, PA.
  • 5American Association for the Advancemenl of Science. (1990). Science for all Americans. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 6Reiff, R. R. (2004). Scientists' conceptions of scientific inquiry: revealing a private side of science. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloom ington, IN.
  • 72Harlen, W. (1999). Purposes and procedures for as sessing science process skills. Assessment in Education, 6 (1), 215- 226.
  • 8Duschl, R. A. (1990). Restructuring science education: the importance of theories and their development. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • 9Reid, N. , & Yang, M-J. (2002). Open ended prohlem solving in school chemistry: A preliminary investigation. International Journal of Science Education, 24(12), 1313 -1332.
  • 10Hodson, D. (1992) Assessment of practical work: Some considerations in philosophy of science. Science & Edu cation, 1, 115- 144.

共引文献122

同被引文献19

引证文献5

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部