1FEMA 273 NEHRP guidelines and commentary for seismic rehabilitation of buildings [ S ]. Washington DC, USA: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 1997.
2FEMA 356 Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings[ S]. Washington DC, USA: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2000.
3FEMA 445 Next-generation performance-based seismic design guidelines: program plan for new and existing buildings [ S]. Washington DC, USA : Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2007.
4Report of the seventh joint planning meeting of NEES/ E-defense collaborative research on earthquake engineering[ R]. PEER 2010/109. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, 2010.
5Roh H. Seismic behavior of structures using rocking columns and viscous dampers [ D ]. Buffalo : University at Buffalo, The State University of New York. Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, 2007.
6Housner G W. The behavior of inverted pendulum structures during earthquakes [ J ]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1963, 53 (2) : 403- 417.
7Hukelbridge A A, Clough R W. Preliminary experimental study of seismic uplift of a steel frame [ R ]. Report No. UCB/EERC-77/22. Berkely: University of California, Berkely, 1977.
8Hukelbridge A A. Earthquake simulation tests of a nine story steel frame with columns allowed to uplift [ R ]. Report No. UCB/EERC-77/23. Berkely: University of California, Berkely, 1977.
9Priestley M J N, Evison R J, Carr A J. Seismic response of structures free to rock on their foundations [ J ]. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 1978, 11 (3) : 141-150.
10Makris N, Konstantinidis D. The rocking spectrum and the shortcomings of design guidelines [ R ]. Report No. PEER-01/07. Bekeley : University of California, Berkeley. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, 2001.
