期刊文献+

关于比较尺度的哲学思考 被引量:1

A Philosophical Reflection on the Measure of Comparison
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文概述并分析了西方近现代有关比较尺度的主要观点, 否定了先验尺度说, 批评了相对主义的无尺度说, 最后, 通过把实用主义尺度说和马克思主义尺度说加以比较, 指出只有马克思主义的社会实践理论才能作为比较的根据,而以实践效果为归宿的可解释性、可预见性、可控制性标准, This paper has briefly stated and analyzed the major outlooks on the measure of comparison, refuted the doctrine of a priori commensurability, and criticized the relativist doctrine of incommensurability. It compares the measures of both pragmatism and Marxism and insists that only Marxism theory of practice be taken as the foundation of comparison and explicability, predictability, and controllability be true measures comparison.
作者 刘开会
出处 《兰州大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2000年第1期66-72,共7页 Journal of Lanzhou University(Social Sciences)
基金 甘肃省哲学社会科学基金
关键词 比较尺度 先验尺度说 无尺度说 measure of comparison doctrine of a priori commensurability doctrine of incommensurability
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献70

  • 1姜永常,杨宏岩,张丽波.基于知识元的知识组织及其系统服务功能研究[J].情报理论与实践,2007,30(1):37-40. 被引量:65
  • 2Afuah A. Business models: A strategic management approach [M]. New York: Irwin/McGraw-Hill, 2004.
  • 3Andrews K R. The concept of corporate strategy[M]. Toron- to: Irwin Publishing, 1994.
  • 4Aspara J. Business model innovation vs replication: Financial performance implications of strategic emphases[J]. Journal ofStrategic Marketing, 2010, 18 ( 1 ) : 39- 56.
  • 5Baden-Fuller C and Morgan M S. Business models as models[J]. Long Range Planning, 2010, 43 (2 / 3) : 156 - 171.
  • 6Bock A and Gerard G. Business model innovation and strategic flexibility : A study of the effects of informal and formal organ ization[R]. Sumantra Ghoshal Conference for Managerially Relevant Research, London, 2010.
  • 7Casadesus Masanell R and Ricart J E. From strategy to busi- ness models and to tactics[J]. Long Range Planning, 2010, 43 (2/3):195-215.
  • 8Chesbrough H W. Open business models[M]. Boston: Har- vard Business School Press, 2006.
  • 9Chesbrough H W. Business model innovation: Opportunities and barriers[J]. Long Range Planning, 2010, 43(2/3):354- 363.
  • 10Christensen C M, et al. Foundation for growth: How to iden- tify and build disruptive new husinesses[M]. Sloan Manage- ment Review, 2002, 43(3):22-31.

共引文献339

同被引文献9

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部