摘要
目的评价国内护理健康教育系统评价/Meta分析方法学和报告质量。方法电子检索万方数据资源系统、中国知网(CNKI)、中文科技期刊数据库(VIP)、中文生物医学期刊数据库(CMCC)、中国中医药数据库等,辅助手工检索近20种国内期刊,两位评估者独立提取数据并录入NoteExpress2建立的信息采集表进行分析。选用OQAQ量表和PRISMA声明分别进行方法学和报告质量评价。结果共纳入14篇合格文献,其中2篇系统评价,12篇Meta分析,在方法学及报告质量上都存在不同程度问题,主要在文献检索、纳入排除标准、真实性评价、数据合并及基金等方面。结论能够达到国际标准的高质量护理健康教育系统评价/Meta分析很少,在接纳和运用其结果时应谨慎。
Objective：To assess the methodology and reporting quality of systematic review or meta-analysis of Nursing Health Education in China.Methods：A comprehensive search of the literature in Wanfang Database、CNKI、VIP、CMCC、TCM Database of China and the regular journals published in china.Two assessment tools were used：（1） OQAQ（the Oxman-Guyatt Overview Quality Assessment Questionnaire）;（2） PRISMA（Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses）.Results：14 papers were identified：2 reviews called＂systematic reviews＂and 12 called＂meta-analyses＂,all the reviews had methodology and reporting flaws that could have influenced the reviews＇ validity,the deficiencies were mainly in literature searches,included and excluded criteria,included studies＇ quality assessment,data merging and funding.Conclusion：The methodology and reporting quality are poor in both systematic review and meta-analysis of nursing health education published in the regular journals of nursing in china.Therefore,the methodology and reporting quality of each individual systematic review and meta-analysis should be scrutinized before accepting and use its results.
出处
《井冈山大学学报（自然科学版）》
2011年第6期118-123,136,共7页
Journal of Jinggangshan University (Natural Science)
