期刊文献+

临床治疗学系统评价/Meta分析文献检索策略的观察研究 被引量:2

Systematic review/meta-analysis of literature retrieval strategies in clinical therapeutics: An observational study
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 以"Meta分析or荟萃分析or系统评价or系统综述"为检索词检索近3年发表在国内期刊上的有关临床治疗学的系统评价和Meta分析文献,对文献检索信息进行统计分析。发现尽管系统评价/Meta分析研究数量越来越多,研究的质量也越来越高,但在证据检索方面还存在很多不足之处。 Papers on systematic review/meta-analysis in clinical therapeutics published in domestic journals in the past 3 years were retrieved using mata-analysis or systematic evaluation or systematic review as the searching term followed by an analysis of their retrieval information, showing that the number of papers on systematic review/meta -analysis is increasing and their academic level is high, but the evidence retrieval still has some limitations.
作者 张新凤
出处 《中华医学图书情报杂志》 CAS 2013年第8期22-24,共3页 Chinese Journal of Medical Library and Information Science
关键词 系统评价 META分析 循证医学 证据检索 检索策略 Systematic review Meta-analysis Evidence based medicine Evidence retrieval Retrieval strategies
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献267

共引文献126

同被引文献36

  • 1邓可刚.循证医学证据的检索步骤与检索系统的选择[J].中国循证医学杂志,2004,4(9):634-637. 被引量:26
  • 2陈春英.Pubmed数据库计算机检索医学信息[J].医学信息(西安上半月),2005,18(2):115-117. 被引量:4
  • 3邓可刚.诊断性研究的检索资源与检索方法[J].中国循证医学杂志,2007,7(4):307-310. 被引量:4
  • 4张伯秋,王超,主编.Dialog国际联机实用手册.北京:化学工业出版社,2009:1-2.
  • 5ProQuest Dialog. Available at: http://search.proquest.com/ professional/index.
  • 6ProQuest Dialog ProSheets. 2014. Available at: http://search. proquest.com/professional/help/professional.zh-CN/webframe. html?View_Field Codes.html.
  • 7Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5,1.0. 2011. Available at: www.cochrane-handbook.org.
  • 8Sackett DL, Straus SE, Richardson WS, et al. Evidence based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM. 2ha ed. London: Churchill Livingstone, 2000: 1-50.
  • 9Margaret S, Jessie M, Elise C, et al. An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies, l Clin Epidemiol, 2009, 62(9): 944-952.
  • 10Moher D, Cook DI, Eastwood S, et al. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet, 1999, 354(9193): 1896-1900.

引证文献2

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部