摘要
Conversational Implicature是格赖斯理论中的一个基本概念,对它的理解的正确与否直接关系到能否对该理论本身的准确把握。它的汉语对应语本来应当是"会话含意",但许多学者却错误地把它译为"会话含义",这对语言学入门者来说是误导。"含义"和"含意"的意思是大不一样的:前者仅指词语等所包含的意思,后者则是指话语或话语中的词语的暗含意义;前者所表示的内容具有客观性,而后者则是言外之意,具有主观性;前者所包含的内容是内在的、静止的、封闭的,而后者所指的内容则是在受话人理解过程中生成的,是外在的、动态的、可延伸的。因此,implicature与"含意"的含义不谋而合。
Implicature is a basic concept in the Gricean theory,so its correct understanding is closely related with the correct understanding of the theory.The appropriate Chinese equivalent of implicature is 含意,but many Chinese scholars put it into 含义,which is certainly misleading for beginners of linguistic studies.The present article holds that 含义and 含意 are quite different in meaning：the former refers to what is included,which is objective by nature,while the latter refers to what is suggested,which is subjective in its essence.What is included in an utterance is intrinsic,quiescent and closed,while what is suggested is generated in the process of understanding of an utterance,whose nature is explicit,dynamic and extensible.Therefore,implicature and 含意 mean exactly the same.
出处
《学术界》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第12期105-109,285,共5页
Academics
基金
安徽省教育厅人文社科重点委托项目的系列论文之一
项目编号:2011sk103zd
