摘要
目的比较腹腔镜器械的两种灭菌方法。方法手术室腹腔镜器械用过氧化氢低温等离子体灭菌器灭菌或用汇日医用灭菌器灭菌,两种方法各50次,比较灭菌时间、经济成本、器械经灭菌后能保持无菌的时间及灭菌成功率。结果低温等离子体灭菌器灭菌,50锅次中成功灭菌的43次,成功率86.0%,汇日医用灭菌器,50次中达到灭菌条件46次,成功率92.0%;低温等离子体灭菌器灭菌成本高,但器械灭菌后无菌有效期长。结论腹腔镜器械用低温等离子体灭菌器灭菌,适用于器械的储存备用,也可用于接台手术;用汇日医用灭菌器灭菌,器械无菌有效期短,一般于接台手术时使用。
OBJECTIVE To compare the two methods of sterilization of laparoscopic instruments. METHODS The laparoscopie instruments in operating room were sterilized by using hydrogen peroxide low-temperature plasma sterilizer sterilization or Huiri Medical Performance Sterilizer sterilization, and 50 times for each method, sterilization time, sterilization failure rate, the economic costs, the time to maintain sterile, and the success rate of sterilization were compared. RESULTS Low temperature plasma sterilizer sterilization equipment, sterilization failure rate was high with the success rate of 86.0~, while Huiri medical Performance Sterilizer was with higher success rate of 92.0% ; although the cost of low temperature plasma sterilizer was high, it had a long validity of keeping instrument sterile. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic instruments with low-temperature plasma sterilizer sterilization is suitable for storage devices, it can also be used for backup continuous operation; the validity of keeping instruments sterile by using Huiri medical performance sterilizer sterilization is short, which can be applied in ol^eration followed tw ~,~,1~ ：A_
出处
《中华医院感染学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2011年第24期5233-5234,共2页
Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology
关键词
低温等离子体灭菌器
汇日医用灭菌器
腹腔镜器械
Low temperature plasma sterilizer
Huiri medical performance sterilizer
Laparoscopic instruments
