摘要
共同但有区别责任是公平分配发达国家和发展中国家全球环境治理责任的基本原则。《京都议定书》适用该原则的基础是发达国家的历史责任和资金技术优势,以及发展中国家经济社会发展的需要。通过比较《京都议定书》和同样体现共同但有区别的《蒙特利尔议定书》,并分析气候变化谈判截至2010年底的最新进展,本文认为共同但有区别的合法性基础应当重塑为自然资源主权和无害国外环境原则,以及全球环境治理利益的公平分享。
Common but differentiated responsibilities could lead to the distribution of differentiated obliga- tion of global environmental governance between developed and developing countries, and Kyoto Protocol is adopted based on the historical responsibility and financial and technological advantages of developed countries and the priority of economic and social development of developing countries. Based on the comparison of Kyoto Protocol and Montreal Protocol and on the analysis of the latest progress of climate nego tiation by 2010, this paper proposes that the legitimacy of common but differentiated responsibilities should be reconstructed as the sovereignty of natural resources and the responsibility of doing no harm to the environment of other states, and the fair distribution of benefit from global environmental governance.
出处
《中国地质大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第6期8-17,共10页
Journal of China University of Geosciences(Social Sciences Edition)
基金
国家社科基金青年项目"气候变化背景下碳捕捉与储存利用法律问题研究"(11CFX032)
广东省社科基金青年项目"气候变化共同但有区别责任的发展趋向"(GD10YFX03)
关键词
共同但有区别责任
京都议定书
蒙特利尔议定书
common but differentiated responsibilities
Kyoto Protocol Montreal Protocol
