期刊文献+

围着床期子宫内膜微血管密度评价子宫内膜容受性 被引量:7

Endometrial microvessel density for assessing endometrial receptivity during the peri-implantation period
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨围着床期子宫内膜微血管密度(MVD)评价子宫内膜容受性的价值。方法选择行体外受精-胚胎移植(IVF-ET)治疗的患者104例,在IVF-ET前1自然周期排卵后7 d用一次性宫腔组织吸引管获取子宫内膜组织,进行扫描电镜观察子宫内膜上皮胞饮突及MVD测定。追踪助孕结局分为临床妊娠组(50例)和未妊娠组(54例)。结果随机抽取临床妊娠组(4例)和未妊娠组(4例)共8例患者的子宫内膜组织行扫描电镜检查,均观察到胞饮突,证实所取的子宫内膜组织均在围着床期。临床妊娠组MVD[(4.12±1.84)%]高于未妊娠组MVD[(3.46±1.26)%],差异有统计学意义(t=-2.127,P=0.036),但MVD预测妊娠的ROC曲线下面积仅为0.598,用于判断妊娠特异性不高。结论在辅助生殖技术中测量子宫内膜MVD评价子宫子宫内膜容受性有一定意义,但是特异性欠佳。 Objective To evaluate the value of endometrial microvessel density(MVD) in assessing the endometrial receptivity during the peri-implantation period.Methods A total of 104 patients undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer(IVF-ET) treatment were analyzed retrospectively.The subjects were divided into clinical pregnancy group(50 cases) and nonpregnant group(54 cases) according to the IVF-ET outcome.Endometrial tissues were collected 7 days after the natural ovulation prior to IVF-ET for measurement of the endometrial MVD using electron microscopy,which was analyzed in relation to the clinical outcome of the treatment.Results The endometrial MVD was significantly higher in the clinical pregnancy group than in the nonpregnant group(4.12±1.84)% vs(3.46±1.26)%,t=-2.127,P=0.036).ROC curve analysis showed that the MVD had an area under the curve slightly over 0.5(0.598) for predicting clinical pregnancy,suggesting a poor specificity in predicting the clinical outcome of the treatment.Conclusion In IVF-ET cycles,the endometrial MVD during the peri-implantation period is helpful for assessing the endometrial receptivity,but the specificity remains low.
出处 《南方医科大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第8期1365-1368,共4页 Journal of Southern Medical University
基金 广东省自然科学基金(06024388 9151051501000066)
关键词 子宫内膜容受性 微血管密度 胞饮突 扫描电镜 体外受精-胚胎移植 endometrial receptivity microvessel density pinopods scanning electron microscopy in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Raga F, Bonilla FM, Casari EM, et al. Assessment of endometrial volume by three-dimensional ultrasound prior to embryo transfer: clues to endometrial receptivity [J]. Hum Reprod, 1999, 14(11): 2851-4.
  • 2Nikas G. Endometrial receptivity:changes in cell-surface morphology[J]. Semin Reprod Med, 2000, 18(3): 229-35.
  • 3Weidner N, Semple JP, Welch WR, et al. Tumor angiogenesis and etastasis-corelation in invasive breast carcinoma[J]. N Engl J Med, 1991, 324(1): 1-8.
  • 4李秋华,全松,陈雷宁,李红,高瑞花,倪郝,余敏,陈思梅,罗琛.160例重复体外受精-胚胎移植周期临床结局分析[J].南方医科大学学报,2010,30(2):236-238. 被引量:7
  • 5Smith SK. Regulation of angiogenesis in the endometrium [J]. Trends Endocrinol Metab, 2001, 12(4): 147-51.
  • 6Nunobiki O, Nakamura M, Taniguchi E, et al. Adrenomedullin, Bcl-2 and microvessel density in normal, hyperplastic and neoplastic endometrium[J]. Pathol Int, 2009, 59(8): 530-6.
  • 7李素春,冯苗,潘萍,苏耘,刘标英,曾少颜.不明原因不孕患者着床窗期子宫内膜容受性分析[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2009,25(7):507-510. 被引量:18
  • 8Achache H, Revel A. Endometrial receptivity markers, the journey to successful embryo implantation[J]. Hum Reprod Update, 2006, 12(6): 731-46.
  • 9Killick SR. Ultrasound and the receptivity of the endometrium [J]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2007, 15( 1): 63-7.

二级参考文献17

  • 1李素春,闫彩平,苏芸,聂琼英,陈瑞玲,钟兴明,汪玉宝.种植窗期子宫内膜类型和白血病抑制因子的关系[J].中国妇幼保健,2007,22(18):2565-2567. 被引量:7
  • 2Sakumoto T, lnafuku K, Miyara M, et al. Hysteroscopic assessment of midsecretory-phase endometrium, with special reference to the luteal-phase defect[ J]. Horm Res, 1992,37 ( Suppl 1 ) : 48 -52.
  • 3Johannisson E, Landgren BM, Rohr HP, et al . Endometrial morphology and peripheral hormone levels in women with regular menstrual cycle[ J ]. Fertil steril, 1987,48:401-408.
  • 4Damario MA, Lesnick TG, Lessey BA, et al. Endometrial markers of uterine receptivity utilizing the donor oocyte model [ J ]. Hum Reprod , 2001,16 (9) :1893-1899.
  • 5Aghajanova L, Stavreus-Evers A, Nikas Y, et al. Coexpression of pinopodes and leukemia inhibitory factor, as well as its receptor, in human endometrium[J]. Fertil Steril, 2003, 79 ( Suppll ) : 808--814.
  • 6Masamoto H, Nakama K, Kanazawa K. Hysteroscopic appearance of the mid-secretory endometrium: relationship to early phase pregnancy outcome after implantation [ J ]. Hum Reprod, 2000 ,15 (10) :2112-2118.
  • 7Kimber S J. Leukemia inhibitory factor in implantation and uterine biology[J].Reproduction , 2005 ,130(2) : 131-145.
  • 8Andersen AN, Gianaroli L, Felberbaum R, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2001. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE [J]. Hum Reprod, 2005, 20 (5): 1158-76.
  • 9Margalioth El, Ben-Chetrit A, Gal M. et al. Investigation and treatment of repeated implantation failure following IVF-ET [J]. Hum Reprod, 2006, 21(12): 3036-43.
  • 10Wang JG, Douglas NC, Dicken C, et al. Cryopreservation of supernumerary high quality embryos predicts favorable outcomes for patients undergoing repeated cycles of in vitro fertilization [J]. Fertil Steril, 2008, 89(2): 368-74.

共引文献23

同被引文献63

引证文献7

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部