期刊文献+

基于MREC灰色模型的电力工业与国民经济协调发展趋势预测和分析 被引量:4

Trend forecast and analysis on the coordinated development between power industry and national economy based on MREC grey model
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 电力工业与国民经济之间的关联关系十分密切,对两者之间未来的协调发展情况进行趋势预测和分析,对于我国电力产业政策以及国家经济政策的制定具有一定的参考价值。通过马尔科夫残差修正灰色模型(MREC),选取电力工业和国民经济评价指标并对2010~2015年各评价指标进行预测,然后计算电力工业和国民经济评价指标的关联度及其耦合度,以此对两者的协调发展趋势进行实证分析,结果表明:我国电力工业与国民经济在未来的几年里,其协调发展的稳定性将进一步增强,其耦合度将维持在0.7左右。 There is a close relationship between China's power industry and national economy.The forecasting and research into the coordinated development trend between them can providea reference for policymaking of power industry and national economy.Using MREC Grey Model(Markov Residual Error Correction Grey Model),selecting the indicators of power industry and national economy and forecasting all indicators for the duration of 2010-2015.Then calculating the correlation and coupling of national economy and the power industry,and analyzing the coordinated development trend.The result is the stability of coordinated development trend between national economy and power industry is enhanced,and the coupling will be maintained at about 0.7.
出处 《华北电力大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS 北大核心 2011年第3期67-71,共5页 Journal of North China Electric Power University:Natural Science Edition
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70971038)
关键词 MREC灰色模型 电力工业 国民经济 耦合度 协调发展 MREC grey model power industry national economy coupling coordinated development
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献95

共引文献296

同被引文献47

  • 1张旭,孙根年.中国电力工业环境学习曲线与节能减排潜力分析[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版),2008,10(4):89-95. 被引量:15
  • 2侯传安,邢文武.我国电力工业市场化改革现状及电价降价措施的探索[J].北京电力高等专科学校学报(自然科学版),2012,29(2):216.
  • 3HUANG B N, HWANG M J, YANG C W. Causal relationship between energy consumption and GDP growth revisited: A dynamic panel data approach [J]. Ecological Economics, 2007, 67(1): 41-54.
  • 4JARUWAN C, LESTER C H, RICHARDi P. Does energy consumption cause economic growth? Evidence from a systematic study of over 100 countries [J]. Journal of Policy Modeling, 2008, 30(2): 209-220.
  • 5RUHUL A S, KAMRYL H, SAHAR S. Renewable and non- renewable energy consumption and economic activities: Further evidence from OECD countries[J]. Energy Economics, 2014, 44(4): 350-360.
  • 6NICHOLA A, JAMES E P. Renewable energy, output, CO2 emissions, and fossil fuel prices in Central America: Evidence from a nonlinear panel smooth transition vector error correction model [J]. Energy Economics, 2014, 42(2): 226-232.
  • 7HAMILTON C, TURTON H. Determinants of emissions growth in OECD countries [J]. Energy Policy, 2002, 30(1): 63-71.
  • 8RAMAZAN S, UGUR S, ERK H. Do global risk perceptions influence world oil prices[J]. Energy Economics, 2011, 33(3): 515-524.
  • 9MUHAMMAD Z V A. Energy, environment and growth nexus in South Asia[J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2013, 15(6): 1465-1475.
  • 10LI H A, MU H L, GUI S S. Analysis of regional difference on impact factors of China’s energy-related CO 2 emissions[J]. Energy, 2012, 39(1): 319-326.

引证文献4

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部