期刊文献+

职业性向:教师评价的重要维度 被引量:11

Professional Aptitude:Important dimension of teacher evaluation
原文传递
导出
摘要 作为一名合格教师,既要具备专业知识和技能,又要具备适合教育工作的人格特征和品质修养等职业性向。教师职业性向是促进教师持续发展的重要保障,是教师情意素养的总和。目前,我国还没有将职业性向纳入教师评价的考核机制。本文指出,职业性向理应成为教师评价的重要维度,特别要成为准教师入职评价的应有维度,这有利于我们从内容、形式、主体性等方面进行教师评价。 Teacher development should not only have a high degree of professional knowledge and skills, but also for educational work with the personality characteristics and quality of training and other professional aptitude. Vocational aptitude of teachers is to promote an important guarantee for the sustainable development of teachers, literacy teachers affective sum. At this stage, our country has not incorporated into teacher evaluation of occupational aptitude assessment mechanism, vocational aptitude should become an important dimension of teacher evaluation,In particular, the entry into the evaluation of prospective teachers should have the dimension ,And from the content, form, subject and other aspects of the implementation of vocational aptitude assessment,thus improve the teacher evaluation system, promote Rapid development of education.
作者 刘雄英
出处 《教育发展研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第8期59-62,共4页 Research in Educational Development
关键词 教师评价 职业性向 teacher evaluation, Professional Aptitude
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1许明.美国关于教师素质的新界定[J].教育评论,2002(1):49-52. 被引量:18
  • 2[日]佐藤学.课程与教师[M].北京:科学教育出版社,2003.212,213.
  • 3吴秋芬.教师专业性向的内涵及其特征[J].中国教育学刊,2008(2):37-40. 被引量:38
  • 4[苏]苏霍姆林斯基.给教师的一百条建议[M].周蕖,等译.天津:天津人民出版社,1981:64.
  • 5老师,您守住爱心的底线了吗[EB/OL].http://www.sq.k12.com.cn/discuz/thread-86446-1-1.html.
  • 6朱永新.透视教师“职业倦怠”呼吁重建职业认同[EB/OL].http://www.old.hnedu.cn/web/0/200907/16211329296.html.
  • 7林本.现代的理想教师[M].台北:开明书店,1984.4.
  • 8明明.优秀教师的标准[J].教师博览(上旬刊),2010(8):4-6. 被引量:1
  • 9[美]特拉弗斯.教师个性品质的塑造[A].瞿葆奎.教育学文集·教师[c].北京:人民教育出版社,1991.237,238.
  • 10高敏嘉.现代日本师资培育制度之研究[D].台湾淡江大学硕士论文,2010.37.

二级参考文献14

  • 1American Council oft Education(1999) .To Touch the Future :Transforming the gray Teachers Are Taught,An Action Agenda for College and University Presidents.
  • 2Linda Darling- Hammond(1999). Teacher Quality. and Student Achievement: A Review of State Policy Evidence. Center for rite Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington. P. 5.http://www.crpweb.org
  • 3Rober Reichardt(2001).Toward a Comprebensive Approach to Teacher Quality.Policy Brief.MCREL,November 2001.
  • 4James D. Raths & Amy C. McAninch (eds), (1999). What Counts as Knowledge in Teacher Education? Advances in Teacher Education, Volume 5. Ablex publishing Corporation, Stanford,Connecticut, pp. 29-45.
  • 5National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education( 2001). Professional Standards for the Accreditation of Schools, Colleges, and Departments of Education. Http://www.ncate.org
  • 6Interstate New Teacher .Assessment and Support Consortium(1992). Model Standards for Beginning Teacher Licensing, Assessment:A Resource for State Dialogue.
  • 7National Board for professional Teaching Standards.(1994), What teachers should know and be able to do.
  • 8凯兴斯泰纳 乔治.凯兴斯泰纳教育论著选[M].郑惠卿,译.北京:人民教育出版社,1993.
  • 9冯塔纳 戴.教师心理学[M].王新超,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2000:447.
  • 10胡森.教育大百科全书.第9卷[M].张斌贤,等译.重庆:西南师范大学出版社,海口:海南出版社,2006.

共引文献80

同被引文献98

引证文献11

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部