期刊文献+

即刻学习判断的系列位置效应:内外部线索的影响 被引量:4

Serial Position Effects of Immediate Judgments of Learning:the Effects of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Cues
原文传递
导出
摘要 为了检验即刻学习判断对内外部线索的敏感性,实验一被试为22名高中生,材料为三列含15个词语的清单,先逐个呈现词语系列位置信息,被试在学习前进行即刻学习判断,结果发现学习判断有显著首因效应,表明学习判断对系列位置信息这一外部线索比较敏感。实验二被试为20名高中生,先逐个呈现词语系列位置信息,被试在学习后进行即刻学习判断,结果发现学习判断同样有显著首因效应,表明学习判断对内部线索的敏感性并未强于外部线索。 Serial position information is one of the extrinsic cues of judgments of learning.Koriat outlined a cue utilization approach to judgments of learning(JOLs),which stated that intrinsic and extrinsic cues could influence judgments of learning via different mechanisms.The present research was conducted to further explore the effects of intrinsic and extrinsic cues on immediate judgments of learning by examining the serial position effects of immediate judgments of learning.The aim of the first experiment was to examine the effects of extrinsic cues on judgments of learning.22 senior high school students took part in it with the pre-JOLs technology adopted.The participants studied 3 lists of 15 in words which each word was displayed for 2 seconds respectively.Before studying each word,the serial positioned information of extrinsic cues was present,and then the participants were asked to make immediate judgment of learning of the upcoming word.The learning word was presented after judgment.After a list of words study,a final free recall test was given.The results showed that there were primacy and recency effects in the recall,and only primacy effects in the immediate judgments of learning;what's more,there was high correlation between recall and immediate judgment of learning.It was suggested that immediate judgments of learning were sensitive to extrinsic cues.The purpose of the second experiment was to compare the effects of intrinsic and extrinsic cues on immediate judgments of learning.20 senior high school students took part in the second experiment,in which intrinsic and extrinsic cues were all present before immediate judgments of learning.More specifically,after the appearance of the serial position information of a word,the relevant word was present subsequently in 2 seconds.Then the participants were asked to make an immediate judgment of learning for each word after learning.After a list of words study,a final free recall test was given.The results also showed that there were primacy effects in the recall,and only primacy effects in the immediate judgments of learning.What's more,there was a significant correlation between recall and immediate judgment of learning.It was suggested that when intrinsic and extrinsic cues were all present,there was no more sensibility of intrinsic cues than extrinsic cues to immediate judgments of learning.These results were in accordance with Koriat's framework regarding the effects of extrinsic cues of serial position information on immediate judgments of learning.In addition,Koriat believes that sensibility of intrinsic cues are more than extrinsic cues to judgments of learning.However,the present research found that there was no more sensibility of intrinsic cues than extrinsic cues to judgments of learning.Maybe it was because when choosing a cue for making judgment of learning,students would compare the significance of two cues,and then would select the dominant one.The results of the present study and further investigatons will be beneficial to the enrich ment of the framework of cue utilization approach of judgments of learning.
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2011年第2期418-422,共5页 Journal of Psychological Science
关键词 即刻学习判断 系列位置效应 内部线索 外部线索 immediate judgments of learning serial position effects intrinsic cues extrinsic cues
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1陈功香,傅小兰.内外部线索对学习判断的影响[J].心理学报,2003,35(2):172-177. 被引量:22
  • 2陈功香,傅小兰.学习判断及其准确性[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(2):176-184. 被引量:60
  • 3陈功香,傅小兰.学习判断中的孤立效应[J].心理科学,2008,31(1):49-53. 被引量:5
  • 4杨莲清,莫雷.学习判断孤立效应的发生机制及作用途径[J].心理科学,2008,31(2):500-503. 被引量:3
  • 5杨莲清,莫雷.学习判断孤立效应的发生机制及作用途径(续)[J].心理科学,2008,31(5):1134-1138. 被引量:1
  • 6Carroll, M., Nelson, T. O., & Kirwan, A. (1997). Tradeoff of semantic relatedness and degree of over learning: Differential effects on metamemory and on long term retention. Acta Psychological, 95, 239 - 253.
  • 7Castel, D. A. (2008). Metacognition and learning about primacy and recency effects in free recall: The utilization of intrinsic and extrinsic cues when making judgments of learning. Memory & Cognition, 36, 429 - 437.
  • 8Castel, D. A., McCabe, P. D., & Roediger, L. H. (2007). Illusions of competence and overestimation of associative memory for identical items: Evidence Psychonomic Bulletin & Revie~ from judgments of learning ,14,107- 111.
  • 9Dunlosky, J., Hunt, R. R., & Clark, E. (2000). Is perceptual salience needed in explanations of the isolation effect? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 649 - 657.
  • 10Dunlosky, J., & Matvey, G. (2001). Empirical analysis of the intrinsic extrinsic distinction of judgments of learning (JOLs): Effects of relatedness and serial position on JOLs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 1180- 1191.

二级参考文献94

  • 1李晓东,张向葵,沃建中.小学三年级数学学优生与学困生解决比较问题的差异[J].心理学报,2002,34(4):400-406. 被引量:33
  • 2沈大为,韩凯.FOK判断与可接近信息之间的关系[J].心理学报,2001,33(4):320-327. 被引量:9
  • 3[1]Dunlosky J, Nelson T O. Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOLs) and the delayed-JOL effect. Memory & Cognition, 1992, 20: 373~380
  • 4[2]Shaw R J, Craik F I M. Age differences in performance on a cue recall task. Psychology and Aging, 1989, 4 (2): 131~135
  • 5[3]Carroll M, Nelson T O, Kirwan A. Tradeoff of semantic relatedness and degree of overlearning: Differential effects on metamemory and on long-term retention. Acta Psychologica, 1997, 95: 239~253
  • 6[4]Koriat A. Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgment of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1997, 126: 349~370
  • 7[5]Koriat A. How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychological Review, 1993, 100: 609~639
  • 8[6]Koriat A. Dissociating knowing and the feeling of knowing: Further evidence for the accessibility model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1995, 124: 311~333
  • 9[7]Kelemen W L. Metamemory for related information is determined by the type of mnemonic cue. The Sciences and Engineering, 1999, 59 (7-B): 3726
  • 10[8]Schreiber T A. Effects of target set size on feelings of knowing and cues recall: Implications for the cue effectiveness and partial-retrieval hypotheses. Memory & Cognition, 1998, 26: 553~571

共引文献71

同被引文献41

  • 1曾晓俊.影响英语学习的心理因素及其对策[J].西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2004,23(4):77-78. 被引量:1
  • 2杨翠芬.英汉思维差异及英语学习对策[J].中国石油大学胜利学院学报,2000,16(2):78-79. 被引量:2
  • 3吴玉霞.基于中西方思维差异的大学英语教学策略探究[J].成功,2013(24):13-14. 被引量:4
  • 4贾宁,白学军,沈德立.学习判断准确性的研究方法[J].心理发展与教育,2006,22(3):103-109. 被引量:24
  • 5苏雅雯.(2009).延迟学习判断效应的实验研究.硕士学位论文.济南:济南大学.
  • 6田凤娟.(2008).学习判断产生机制的实验研究.西南大学硕士学位论文.
  • 7吴俊杰.(2007).学.习判断及其准确性的实验研究.河南大学硕士学位论文.
  • 8Castel, D. A. , McCabe, P. D. , & Roediger, L.H. (2007). Illusions of competence and overestimation of associative memory for identical i- tems: Evidence from judgments of learning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14 (1) , 107 - 111.
  • 9Dunlosky, J. , & Nelson, T.O. (1992). Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning ( JOLs ) and the delayed - JOL effect. Memory and Cognition, 20, 373 - 380.
  • 10Dunlosky, J. , & Nelson, T.O. (1994). Does the sensitivity of judgment of learning (JOLs) to the effects of various study activities depend on when the JOLs occur? Journal of Memory and Language, 33,545 - 565.

引证文献4

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部