期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

工作场所欺负与情感承诺、离职意向的关系 被引量：12

A Study on the Relationship among Workplace Bullying,Affective Commitment and Intention to Leave
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨工作场所欺负与情感承诺、离职意向的关系。方法:采用问卷调查法,以436名企业员工为被试,通过相关分析、回归分析、结构方程模型等技术对数据进行统计分析。结果:①工作场所欺负能负向预测个体的情感承诺水平;②工作场所欺负能正向预测个体的离职意向水平;③情感承诺在工作场所欺负与离职意向之间的中介作用显著。结论:工作场所欺负能显著预测员工情感承诺与离职意向,情感承诺在工作场所欺负与离职意向的关系间起部分中介作用。 Objective：To investigate the relationship among workplace bullying,affective commitment and intention to leave.Methods：Questionnaire investigation was used to collect research data,which were analyzed by correlative analysis,multiple hierarchical regressions and SEMs.Results：①Workplace bullying could negatively predict the employees＇ affective commitment.②Workplace bullying could positively predict the employees＇ intention to leave.③Mediation effects of affective commitment between workplace bullying and intention to leave was significant.Conclusion：Workplace bullying is a significant predictor of affective commitment and intention to leave,and affective commitment partially mediates the effects of bullying on intention to leave.
作者 聂光辉 李永鑫 唐峥华
机构地区 广西医科大学公共卫生学院 河南大学心理与行为研究所
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 2011年第1期113-115,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
关键词 工作场所欺负 情感承诺 离职意向 Workplace bullying Affective commitment Intention to leave
分类号 R395.6 [医药卫生—医学心理学]
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Quine L. Workplace bullying in NHS community trust: Staff questionnaire survey. British Medical Journal, 1999, 318: 228-232.
  • 2Rayner C, Hole H, Cooper CL. Workplace Bullying. London and New York, 2002.
  • 3Chappell D, Martino V. Violence at work. 3rd Edition. Geneva: ILO (International Labor Organization), 2006.
  • 4Mikkelsen EG, Einarsen S. Relationships between exposure to bullying at work and psychological and psychosomatic health complaints. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 2002, 43:397-405.
  • 5Tepper BJ. Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 2000, 43:178-190.
  • 6MeCormack D, Casimir G, Djurkovic N, et al. The concurrent effects of workplace bullying, satisfaction with supervisor, and satisfaction with co-workers on effective commitment among schoolteachers in china. International Journal of Conflict Management, 2006, 17(4): 316-331.
  • 7Djurkovic N, McCornlaek D, Casimir G. The physical and psychological effects of workplace bullying and their rela- tionship to intention to leave: A test of the psychosomatic and disability hypotheses. International Journal of Organiza- tion Theory and Behavior, 2004, 7(4): 469-497.
  • 8McComack D, Casimir G, Djurkovic N, et al. Workplace bullying and intention to leave among schooheachers in China: The mediating effect of affective commitment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2009, 39(9): 2106-2127.
  • 9Allen NJ, Meyer JP. Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization:An examination of construct validity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1996, 49(3): 252- 276.
  • 10Randall ML, Cropanzano R, Bormann CA, et al. Organizational politics and organizational support as predictors of work attitudes, job performance, and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1999, 20 (2): 159-174.

二级参考文献49

  • 1Bandalos D L, Finney S J. Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling. In Marcoulides G A, Schumacker R E (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, 2001. 269-296.
  • 2Bagozzi R P, Edwards J R. A general approach for representing constructs in organizational research.Organizational Research Methods, 1998, 1: 45-87.
  • 3Little T D, Lindenberger U, Nesselroade J R. On selecting indicators for multivariate measurement and modeling with latent variables: When “good”indicators are bad and “bad”indicators are good. Psychological Methods, 1999, 4:192-211.
  • 4Little T D, Cunningham W A, Shahar G, Widaman K F. To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 2002, 9:151-173.
  • 5Hu L-T, Bentler P M. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspeeification. Psychological Methods, 1998, 3(4): 424-453 .
  • 6Cumin P J, West S G, Finch J F. The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1996,1(1): 16-29.
  • 7West S G, Finch J F, Curran P J. Structural equation modeling with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies.In Hoyle R H (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts,issues, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1995.56-75.
  • 8Hau K T, Marsh H W. The use of item parcels in structural equation modeling: Non-normal data and small sample size.British Journal of Mathematical Statistical Psychology, 2004,57:327-351.
  • 9Rushton J P, Brainerd C J, Pressley M. Behavioral development and construct validity: The principle of aggregation. Psychological Bulletin, 1983, 94:18-38.
  • 10Cohen P, Cohen J, Teresi J, Marchi M, Noemi Velez C.Problems in the measurement of latent variables in structural equations causal models. Applied Psychological Measurement,1990,14:183-196.

共引文献121

同被引文献202

引证文献12

二级引证文献55

中国临床心理学杂志
2011年 第1期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部