期刊文献+

不同类型支架治疗大脑中动脉狭窄病变的对比研究

Comparison study of different types of stent for treatment of stenosis of middle cerebral artery
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨不同类型支架治疗大脑中动脉狭窄病变的临床效果和影像学结果。方法选择大脑中动脉M1段狭窄病变的患者67例,根据置入的支架不同,将患者分为3组:Invastent组21例,影像学检查平均随访18.6个月;Apollo组1 7例,影像学检查平均随访19.5个月;Wingspan组29例,影像学检查平均随访1 5.1个月,对3组临床事件和影像学结果进行COX分析。结果 67例患者共置入69枚支架,Invastent组、Apollo组和Wingspan组支架置入成功率分别为95.8%、100%和96.7%(P>0.05)。Invastent组缺血性脑卒中和(或)死亡发生率15.8%,Apo1lo组为6.3%,Wingspan组为10.3%,3组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。影像学随访Wingspan组再狭窄率虽高于Invastent组和Apollo组(33.0 % vs 15.8%.12.5%),但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。Wingspan支架是术后再狭窄的危险因素(HR=4.37,95% CI:1.02~18.78,P=0.047)。结论与球囊扩张式支架置入比较,Wingspan支架是术后再狭窄的危险因素,其与临床预后无关,但需进一步研究证实。 Objective To investigate clinical efficacy and angiographic outcomes of different stents in treatment of the stenosis of middle cerebral artery. Methods The data of 67 patients undergoing single stent placement in the M1 segment of middle cerebral artery were retrieved. According to the type of stent implanted,the patients were divided into three groups:21 patients in Ivastent group, 17 in Apollo group, and 29 in Wingspan group. Average image follow-up time was 16. 6 months. COX regression model was used to analyze the clinical and angiographic outcomes. Results A total of 69 stents were implanted for 67 patients. The rates of successful stent implantation in Invastent group,Apollo group and Wingspan group were 95.8%, 100% and 96. 7% respectively (P 〉 0.05). The incidence of ischemie stroke and(or) death was 15.8%in Invastent group, 6.3% in Apollo group and 10.3% in Wingspan group, and there was no statistically significant difference among the three groups (P 〉 0.05). Although there was no statistical significance,the incidence of restenosis after stent deployment in Wingspan group was higher than that of the Invastent group and Apollo group(33.0% vs 15.8% and 12.5%, P 〉0.05). Wingspan stent was a risk factor for restenosis by multivariate Cox regression model analysis (HR = 4. 37,95% CI: 1.02-18.78, P = 0. 047). Conclusion Wingspan stent is a risk factor for restenosis after stent placement, but it is not related to the clinical outcomes. The findings should be confirmed further by multi-center,large sample size studies.
出处 《中华老年心脑血管病杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2010年第10期888-891,共4页 Chinese Journal of Geriatric Heart,Brain and Vessel Diseases
基金 国家自然科学基金(30870847) 江苏省自然科学基金(BK2008324)
关键词 大脑中动脉 脑血管障碍 支架 血管成形术 气囊 middle cerebral artery cerebrovaseular disorders stents angioplasty, balloon
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Chimowitz MI,Lynn MJ,Howlett-Smith H,et al.Comparison of warfarin and aspirin for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis.N Engl J Med,2005,352:1305-1316.
  • 2Lee TH,Choi CH,Park KP,et al.Techniques for intracranial stent navigation in patients with tortuous vessels.Am J Neuroradiol,2005,26:1375-1380.
  • 3Levy EI,Turk AS,Albuquerque FC,et al.Wingspan in-stent restenosis and thrombosis:incidence,clinical presentation,and management.Neurosurgery,2007,61:644-650.
  • 4Schumacher HC,Meyers PM,Higashida RT,et al.Reporting standards for angioplasty and stent-assisted angioplasty for intracranial atherosclerosis.Stroke,2009,40:e348-e365.
  • 5Samuels OB,Joseph GJ,Lynn MJ,et al.A standardized method for measuring intracranial arterial stenosis.Am J Neuroradiol,2000,21:643-646.
  • 6焦德让.老年脑血管病介入治疗的地位及进展[J].中华老年心脑血管病杂志,2009,11(8):561-563. 被引量:2
  • 7Jiang WJ,Xub XT,Jinc M,et al.Apollo stent for symptomatic atherosclerotic intracranial stenosis:study results.Am J Neuroradiol,2007,28:830-834.
  • 8马敏敏,张仁良,殷勤,徐格林,周志明,朱武生,樊新颖,刘新峰.Wingspan支架治疗症状性颅内动脉狭窄的临床研究[J].中华老年心脑血管病杂志,2009,11(8):564-566. 被引量:4
  • 9Bose A,Hartmann M,Henkes H,et al.A novel,self-expanding,nitinol stent in medically refractory intracranial atherosclerotic stenoses:the Wingspan study.Stroke,2007,38:1531-1537.
  • 10Groschel K,Schnaudigel S,Pilgram SM,et al.A systematic review on outcome after stenting for intracranial atheroscierosis.Stroke,2009,40:e340-e347.

二级参考文献24

  • 1刘建民,黄清海,许奕,洪波.血管内支架成形术治疗颅内宽颈动脉瘤及长期随访结果[J].中华神经外科杂志,2005,21(2):67-70. 被引量:62
  • 2Wholey MH. Current status of carotid artery stent placement. J Cardiovase Surg(Torino) ,2006,47 : 101-105.
  • 3Yadav JS,Wholey MH,Kuntz RE,et al. Protected carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high risk patients. N Engl J Med,2004,351:1493-1501.
  • 4Goodney PP,Schermerhom ML, Powel[ R]. Current status of carotid artery stenting. J Vasc Surg, 2006,43 : 406-411.
  • 5David Fi,Elad I, Aquilla S, et al. US muhicenter experience with the Wingspan stent system for the treatment of intracranial atheromatous disease. Stroke, 2007,38: 881-887.
  • 6Jiang W J, Xu b XT.Jinc M, et al. Apollo stent for symptomatic atherosclerotic intracranial stenosis:study results. Am J Neuroradiol, 2007,28 : 830-834.
  • 7Higashida RT, Halbach VV, Dowd CF, et al. Initial clinical experience with a new self-expanding nitinol stent for the treatment of intracranial cerebral aneurysms: the Cordis Enterprise stent. Am J Neuroradiol, 2005,26 : 1751.
  • 8Clark TW, Sankin A, Becske T, et al. Stent assisted gugliemi detachable coil repair of wide necked renal artery aneurysm using 3-D angiography. Vasc Endovascular Surg, 2007, 41:528-532.
  • 9Doerfler A, Wanke I, Egelhof T, et al. Double-stent method: therapeutic alternative for small wide-necked aneurysms. J Neurosurg,2004,100: 150-158.
  • 10Hanaoka M, Satoh K, Satomi J, et al. Microcatheter pull-up technique in the transvenous embolization of an isolated sinus dural arteriovenous fistula. J Neurosurg, 2006,104 : 974-977.

共引文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部