摘要
在民事诉讼中,法院的释明不仅有助于增强法院与当事人之间的沟通与交流,弥补辩论主义的缺陷,也有助于防止突袭性裁判,促进案件审理的实质公正,提升司法的公信力。释明范围的扩大化已成当今民事诉讼发展的普遍趋势。司法实践中的典型案例表明,我国民事诉讼中释明的范围还有进一步拓展的必要。可以考虑以消极释明与积极释明的划分为基本框架,通过一般规则与案例指导确定释明的合理范围。
In civil action,the court＇s interpretation contributes to enhancing the communication betweenthe court and the parties,making up the defect of the principle of debate,preventing the surprising judgments,promoting the substantive justice of trail,and enhancing the credibility of justice. Expanding the scopeof the court＇s interpretation has been a general trend in the developing of the civil procedure. From the classical cases in our judicial practice,we can conclude that it is necessary to further expand the scope of interpretation in civil action. In order to clear the proper scope of interpretation,we should establish the general rulesand the system of case guide,which should be based on the framework of negative interpretation and active in-terpretation.
出处
《中国法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第5期133-142,共10页
China Legal Science
基金
作者承担的中国法学会部级课题"民事诉讼中法院行使释明权的实证研究"(编号CLS-C0935)的阶段性成果
