期刊文献+

大学生自我同一性状态与“大五”人格、因果取向的关系 被引量:29

Ego Identity Status,"Big Five"Personality and Causality Orientation in University Students
原文传递
导出
摘要 通过对536名大学生的问卷调查,采用结构方程模型考察了大学生的自我同一性状态与"大五"人格、因果取向之间的关系。结果发现,(1)"大五"人格和因果取向均是大学生自我同一性状态的重要预测因素,能在较大程度上解释大学生所处自我同一性状态(特别是同一性获得状态和扩散状态)上的差异;(2)因果取向在"大五"人格对自我同一性状态的影响中起重要的中介作用。 Individual characteristics have important influence on college students' identity formation. This study aimed to investigate the relations among personality, causality orientation and ego identity status in university students by SEM, especially exploring the individual internal mechanism of ego identity formation. 536 university students from freshman to senior participated in the questionnaire investigation. The results indicated: (1) both "big five" personality and causality orientation had strongly effect on university students' ego identity statuses, which can greatly explain the difference of university students' ego identity statuses, especially the identity achievement status and identity diffusion status. (2) causality orientation mediated the relation between "big five" personality and ego identity status in university students.
出处 《心理发展与教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第5期495-501,共7页 Psychological Development and Education
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点基地重大项目(06JJDXLX002) 山东省软科学项目(2009RKA085) 济南大学博士基金课题(B0813) 山东省教学改革研究项目(2009200)
关键词 大学生 自我同一性 自我同一性状态 “大五”人格 因果取向 university students ego identity ego identity status "big five" personality causality orientation
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Bennion,L. D. , & Adams, G. R. (1986). A revision of the extended objective measure of ego-identity status: An identity instrument for use with late adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 1, 183 - 198.
  • 2Berzonsky, M. D. , & Adams, G. R. (1999). Reevaluating the identity status paradigm: still useful after 35 years. Developmental Review, 19, 557 - 590.
  • 3Bosma, H. A. , & Kunnen, E. S. (2001). Determinants and mechanisms in ego identity development: A review and synthesis. Developmental Review, 2, 39 - 66.
  • 4Clancy, S. M., & Dollinger, S. J. (1993). Identity, self, and personality : Identity status and the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 3 ( 3), 227 - 245.
  • 5Costa, P. T. , & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • 6Deei, E. L. , & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The General Causality Orientation Scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 109- 134.
  • 7Deponte, AI (2004). Linking motivation to personality: Causality orientations, motives and self-descriptions. European Journal of Personality, 18, 31 -44.
  • 8Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.
  • 9Kroger, J. (2000). Identity development: Adolescence through adulthood. London: Sage.
  • 10Marcia, J. E. ( 1966). Development and validation of ego identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 551 -558.

二级参考文献13

  • 1J E Marcia, Waterman A S, Matteson D R et al. Ego-identity : the Handbook of Psychosocial Research. New York : Open University Press, 1993,1 - 7.
  • 2Jane Kroger. Discussions on Ego ldentity. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1993 : preface, 13.
  • 3Jane Kxoger. Identity in Adolescence: The Balance Between Self and Other. London and New York: Routledge, 1989:34 - 39.
  • 4J E Marcia, Waterman A S, Matteson D R et al. Egoidentity : the Handbook of Psychosocial Research. New York : Open University Press, 1993.5-6.
  • 5A S Waterman. Identity in Adolescence: Processes and Contents. London: Jossey-Bass Social Inc., 1985.11 - 13.
  • 6J E Marcia, Waterman A S, Matteson D R et al. Egoidentity: the Handbook of Psychosocial research. New York: Open University Press, 1993:22- 31.
  • 7Jane Kroger. Identity Devdopment: Adolescence Through Adulthood. London:Sage Publications,2000:105- 107.
  • 8G R Adams. Adolescent Identity Formation. London: Sage Publications, 1992:10 - 12,50 - 57,173 - 189.
  • 9John Heaa. Working with Adolescents: Constructing Identity.London: Falmer Press, 1997.13.
  • 10Seth J. Schwartz.The Evolution of Eriksonian and Neo-Eriksonian Identity Theory and Research: A Review and Integafion. Identity:An International Journal of Theory and Research, 2001,1 ( 1 ) : 7 - 58.

共引文献68

同被引文献336

引证文献29

二级引证文献189

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部