大学生英语阅读能力自我评价的实证研究被引量：31

College Students' Self-assessment of Their English Reading Abilities

下载PDF

导出

摘要本文以问卷调查和阅读理解测试为工具考察了大学生对英语阅读能力的自我评价。研究结果表明:1)受试总体上能对自己的英语阅读能力做出比较可靠、有效的自我评价。评价任务越具体,自我评价的准确性越高,而且,多样性的评价任务比单一的评价任务更有助于受试做出可靠、有效的自我评价。2)受试对英语阅读能力的自我评价受到自身语言水平的影响,语言水平越高,自我评价能力越强。3)多数受试对自我评价过程反应积极。 The present study investigates 97 college students' self-assessment of their English reading abilities.The results show that:(1) generally most of the students can make a relatively reliable self-assessment of their reading abilities,and specific self-assessment tasks are conducive to reliability of such self-assessment;(2) the students' self-assessment is affected by their language proficiency;and(3) most of the students show positive response to the self-assessment process.

作者徐锦芬李红李斑斑

机构地区华中科技大学外国语学院广东药学院外语部常熟理工学院外国语学院

出处《解放军外国语学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第5期46-50,共5页 Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages

基金国家社会科学基金项目(08BYY027)

关键词英语阅读能力自我评价语言水平

分类号 H319.4 [语言文字—英语]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献19

1段春云,王军.试论外语课堂教学中的自我评价[J].山东外语教学,1998,19(4):83-86. 被引量：10
2刘建达.学生英文写作能力的自我评估[J].现代外语,2002,25(3):241-249. 被引量：65
3楼荷英.自我评估同辈评估与培养自主学习能力之间的关系[J].外语教学,2005,26(4):60-63. 被引量：69
4A1Fallay, I. The role of some selected psychological and personality traits of the rater in the accuracy of self- and peer-assessment [J]. System, 2004, 32 (3) : 407 -425.
5Bachman, L.F. & A. S. Palmer. The construct validation of self-ratings of communicative language ability [ J ]. Language Testing, 1989, 6 (1): 14-29.
6Falchikov, N. Product comparisons and process benefits of collaborative peer group and self assessment [ J ]. Assessment and Evaluation in HigherEducation, 1986, 11 (2): 146- 166.
7Jansscn-van Dieten, A. The development of a test of Dutch as a second language: The validity of self-assessment by in-experienced subjects [ Jl. Language Testing, 1989, 6 (1) : 30 -46.
8Krausert, S. Determining the Usefulness of Self-assessment of Foreign Language Skills: Post-secondary ESL Students Placement Contribution [ D ]. Dissertation Abstracts International, 1992, 52: 3143A.
9Leung, C. & B. Mohan. Teacher formative assessment and talk in classroom contexts: Assessment as discourse and assessment of discourse [J]. Language Testing, 2004, 21 (3) : 335 - 359.
10Orsmond, P. , S. Merry & K. Reiling. A study in self-assessment: Tutor and students' perceptions of performance criteria [ J ]. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 1997, 22 (4) : 357 -369.

二级参考文献56

1高吉利.国内外语自主学习研究状况分析综述[J].外语教学,2005,26(1):60-63. 被引量：226
2刘建达.学生英文写作能力的自我评估[J].现代外语,2002,25(3):241-249. 被引量：65
3AlFally, I. The role of some selected psychological and personality traits of the rater in the accuracy of self-and peer-assessment[J]. System ,2004(3):407-425.
4Bachman, L. and Palmer, A. The construct validation of self-ratings of communicative language ability [J]. Language Testing,1989(6) :14-19.
5Benson, P.Teaching and Researching Autonomy in Language Learning[M]. Pearson Education, 2001.
6Falehikov & Magin. Detecting gender bias in peer marking of students' group process work[J]. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 1997 (22) : 385-396.
7Freeman,M. Peer assessment by groups of group work[J]. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 1995 (20) : 289-99.
8Gardner, D.& Miller, L. Establishing Self-access from Theory to Practice[M]. CUP, 1999.
9Lewkowiez & Moon. Evaluation, A way of involving the learner[A]. In J. C, Alderson(ed.), Evaluation: Lancaster Practical Papers in English Language Education [C]. Oxford:Pergamon Press, 1985:45-80.
10Li, L. Some refinement on peer assessment of group projects[J].Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 2001(26):5-18.