期刊文献+

自锁托槽的研究新进展 被引量:3

暂未订购
导出
摘要 自锁托槽与传统托槽在结构、基本原理以及结扎方式等临床应用方面都有许多的不同点。诸如快速结扎、低摩擦力、疗程缩短、较少疼痛等。本文试从以下方面对自锁托槽作一阐述。
作者 黄丞一 刘丽
出处 《全科医学临床与教育》 2010年第1期44-45,49,共3页 Clinical Education of General Practice
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Stolzenberg J. The sfficiency of the Russell attachment [J]. Am J Orthod Oral Surg, 1946, 32(10): 572-582.
  • 2Harradine NWT. Self-ligating brackets and treatment efficiency[J]. Clin Orthod Res, 2001, 4(4): 220-227.
  • 3Harradine NWT. Self-ligating brackets: Where are we now [J]? J Othrod, 2003, 30(3): 262-273.
  • 4Rinchuse D J, Miles PG. Self-ligating brackets: present and future[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2007, 132(2): 216-222.
  • 5Kusy RP, Whidey JQ. Friction between different wirebracket configurations and materials [J]. Semin Orthod, 1997, 3(3): 166-177.
  • 6Shivapuja PK, Berger J. A comparative study of conventional ligation and self-ligation bracket systems [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1994, 106(5): 472-480.
  • 7Sims APT, Waters NE, Birnie D J, et al. A comparison of the forces required to produce tooth movement in vitro using two self-ligating brackets and a preadjusted bracket employing two types of ligation[J]. Eur J Orthod, 1993, 15(5): 377-385.
  • 8Pizzoni L Raunhoh G, Melsen B. Frictional forces related to self-ligating brackets [J]. Eur J Orthod, 1998, 20 (3): 283- 291.
  • 9Matasa CG. Self-engaging brackets: Passive vs. active Orthod[J]. Mat Insider, 1996, 9(1): 5-11.
  • 10Bednar JR, Gruendeman GW, Sandrik JL. A comparative study of frictional forces between orthodontic brackets and arch wires [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1991, 100 (6): 513-22.

二级参考文献26

  • 1Derek Mahony,刘妍(译).将正畸带入二十一世纪[J].口腔正畸学,2006,13(4):200-201. 被引量:1
  • 2姜若萍,傅民魁.自锁托槽的特点及其临床应用(第二部分)[J].口腔正畸学,2007,14(1):45-48. 被引量:18
  • 3Steiner GG, Pearson JK, Ainamo J. Changes of the marginal periodontium as a result of labial tooth movement in monkeys. J Periodontol, 1981,52 (6) : 314-320.
  • 4Thilander B, Nyman S, Karring T, et al. Bone regeneration in alveolar bone dehiscences related to orthodontic tooth movements. Eur J Orthod, 1983,5(2) :105-114.
  • 5Damon DH. The Damon low-friction bracket: a biologically compatible straight-wire system. J Clin Orthod, 1998,32 ( 11 ) : 670-680.
  • 6Pizzoni L, Ravnholt G, Melsen B. Frictional forces related to selfligating brackets. Eur J Orthod, 1998, 20(3) :283-291.
  • 7Henao SP, Kusy RP. Evaluation of the frictional resistance of conventional and self-ligating bracket designs using standardized archwires and dental typodonts. Angle Orthod, 2004,74 ( 2 ) : 202 -211.
  • 8Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Eliades T. Self-ligating vs conventional brackets in the treatment of mandibular crowding: a prospective clinical trial of treatment duration and dental effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2007,132 ( 2 ) : 208 -215.
  • 9Menendez M, Alarcon JA, Travesi A, et al. Evaluation of dental arch width and form changes after orthodontic treatment with the Damon system. Proceedings of the International Orthodontic Conference ; 2005. Chicago : Quintessence ,2005:445.
  • 10Weinberg M, Sadowsky C. Resolution of mandibular arch crowding in growing patients with Class I malocelusions treated nonextraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1996, 110 ( 4 ) : 359-364.

共引文献50

同被引文献23

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部