摘要
目的探讨中国与孟加拉国、印度、巴基斯坦维和官兵心理健康的差异及干预的效果。方法用中国军人心理健康量表（CMMHS）对中国与亚洲3国维和官兵的心理健康状况进行评估，同时进行心理干预。结果亚洲三国的CMMHS总分及掩饰因子分均显著高于中国维和官兵（t=1．940～3．945，P=0．000～0．047）。心理干预前，除孟加拉国的强迫因子分明显高于印度外（t=2．113，P=0．000）．其余三国CMMHS因子分无统计学意义（P〉0．05）；干预后，亚洲三国维和官兵CMMHS多数因子分明显下降（t=2．118～3．094，P=0.002～0．036；t=1．705～4．968．P=0．000～0．035：t=2．107～70．706．P=0．000．0．037）。CMMHS各因子分与年龄、军龄等无明显相关关系（P〉0．05）。结论亚洲三国及中国维和官兵心理健康均受到明显影响，但各因子影响不显著。各国维和官兵心理问题经心理干预后均效果显著.
Objective To explore the difference of mental health between Chinese Bangladeshi, Indian and Pakistani peacekeepers and the mental intervention effect. Methods The mental health of the Chinese and Asian peacekeeping soldiers was investigated by Chinese Military Mental Health Scale （CMMHS） , while mental interventions were undertaken on them. Results The total scores and lie factor of CMMHS of Asian peacekeepers （ Bangladeshi, Indian, Pakistani） were significantly higher than that of Chinese peacekeepers （t = 1. 940 - 3. 945, P = 0.000 - 0. 047 ）. Before mental intervention, except the obsessive factor of Bangladeshi obviously higher than India,the other factors of AMMHS were not statistically significant （P〉 0.05 ）; after mental intervention, CMMHS factors score of these Asian peacekeepers significantly declined （t = 2.118 -3. 094, P = 0. 002 -0. 036; t = 1. 705 -4. 968, P=0. 000 - 0. 035 ; t = 2. 107 - 70. 706, P = 0. 000 - 0. 037 ）. CMMHS factors score of these Asian peacekeepers had no correlation with the age and military years, et al. Conclusion There is an obviously influence on mental health of peacekeepers of the three Asian countries and China, while each factor no significant differences. Mental intervention showed a good effect on them.
出处
《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2009年第10期936-938,共3页
Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
