期刊文献+

事件影响量表-修订版(IES-R)在女性犯人中的信度、效度分析 被引量:87

The Chinese Version of the Impact of Event Scale-Revised: Reliability and Validity
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:建立事件影响量表-修订版22个条目量表(IES-R)的中文版。方法:439名经过至少1件创伤性事件的女犯人完成了IES-R,分析量表的重测信度和内部一致性、条目间平均相关系数;总分与各因子间的相关系数、内容区分效度,并进行划界分的诊断性评价。结果:IES—R中文版的重测信度为0.86,Cronbach'sα系数为0.96,条目间平均相关系数在0.42—0.60之间。总分与各因子的相关系数在0.84—0.91之间,各因子间的相关系数在0.75~0.89之间,PTSD组的总分明显高于非PTSD组。划界分35时,对PTSD和部分PTSD诊断预测的敏感度为0.86、特异度0.86、诊断效率0.85。结论:IES-R中文版具有良好的信、效度,在我国可以作为一种较好的创伤后应激症状的测评工具。划界分35,量表对PTSD和部分PTSD有一定的预测力。 Objective: To develop the Chinese version of the 22-item Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-RC) and examine its reliability and validity. Methods: A sample of 439 female offenders experiencing at least one traumatic life event was tested. The authors examined the IES-R-C's retest reliability, internal consistency, discriminative validity and predictive value of the cut-off. Results: The test-retest reliability coefficient was 0. 86 ; The Cronbach's coefficient of the IES-R-C was 0. 96 ; The mean inter-item correlation coefficients ranged from0.42 to 0. 60 ; The correlation coefficient of the three factors with the total scale scores ranged from0.84 to 0. 91 ; The correlation coefficient among the three factors ranged from 0. 75 to 0. 89 ; Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and partial PTSD cases indicated significantly higher scores than non-PTSD cases. 34/35 in the IES-R-C total score seemed an appropriate cutoff indicative of high levels of sensitivity ( 0. 86 ) , specificity ( 0. 86 ), and efficiency ( 0. 86 ) in the broadly defined PTSD-positive groups ( PTSD + partial PTSD) . Conclusion: the of IES-R-C is a reliable and valid measure for assessing the posttranmatic stress symptoms in Chinese-speaking sample. The IES-R-C may be a useful self-rating diagnostic instrument particularly for survivors with PTSD symptoms as a clinical concern ( PTSD + partial PTSD) by using a 34/35 cutoff in total score.
出处 《中国心理卫生杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2006年第1期28-31,共4页 Chinese Mental Health Journal
关键词 创伤后应激障碍 心理测量学研究 信度 效度 PTSD psychometric studies reliability validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 3rd ed. Washington DC: Author,1980.
  • 2中华医学会精神科分会.中国精神疾病分类方案与诊断标准(CCMD-3)·第3版[M].济南:山东科学技术出版社,2001..
  • 3Nozomua A, Hiroshi K, Noriyuki K, et al. Reliability and validity of the Japanese-language version of the impact of event scale-revised (IES-R-J) : for studies of different traumatic events. J Nerv Ment Dis, 2002, 190 (3) : 175-182.
  • 4Horowitz MJ, Wilner N, Alvarez W. Impact of event scale: A measure of subjective stress. Psychosom Med, 1979, 41 (3) : 209-218.
  • 5Weiss DS, Marmar CR. The impact of the Event Scale-Revised. In: Wilson JP, Keane TM Eds. Assessing psychological trauma and PTSD: A practitioner's handbook. New York:Guilford Press, 1997. 399-411.
  • 6Edward SK, Stephen NH, Mary BL, et al. Development and preliminary validation of a brief broad-spectrum measure of traumas exposure: The traumatic life events questionnaire.Psychol Assess, 2000, 12 (2) : 210-224.
  • 7黄国平,张亚林,杨世昌.海洛因依赖者的创伤性事件及其PTSD症状频率[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2004,12(4):393-395. 被引量:7
  • 8Huang Guoping, Zhang Yalin, Momartin S, et al. Prevalence and Characteristics of Trauma and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Female Offenders in China. Comprehensive Psychiatry.2005 (in press) .
  • 9Blake DD, Weathers FW, Nagy LM, et al. The development of a clinician-administered PTSD scale. J Trauma Stress, 1995,8 (1): 75-90.
  • 10Blanchard EB, Hickling EJ, Taylor AE, et al. Psychiatric morbidity associated with motor vehicle accidents. J Nerv Ment Dis, 1995, 183 (8): 485-504.

二级参考文献11

  • 1[1]Friedman MJ. PTSD as a Severe Mental Illness.Clinical Quarterly.Fall.1999, 8(4):63
  • 2[2]Wohlfarth TD,Brink W,Winkel FM,et al.Screening for posttraumatic stress disorder:an evalution of two self-report scales among crime victims.Psychological Assessment.2003,15(1):101-109
  • 3[3]中华医学会精神科分会.中国精神疾病分类方案与诊断标准(CCMD-3).山东科学技术出版社.2003
  • 4[5]Kubany ES, Haynes SN, Leisen MB, et al. Development and preliminary validation of a brief broad-spectrum measure of trauma exposure: The Traumatic Life Events Questionnaire. Psychological Assessment, 2000,12:210-224
  • 5[6]American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author,1994
  • 6[7]Horowitz M,Wilner N,Alvarez W. Impact of event scale:a measure of subjective distress. Psychosomatic Medicine,1979,41:207-218
  • 7[8]Chilcoat HD, Breslau N. Investigations of casual pathways between PTSD and drug use disorders. Addict Behav,1998,23:827-840
  • 8[9]Kathleen TB. Comorbid Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Substance Use Disorders. Psychiatric Annals,2001,31(5):313-319
  • 9[10]Resnick HS, Kilpatrick DG, Dansky BS, Saunders BE, Best CL. Prevalence of civilian trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder in a representative national sample of women. J Consult Clin Psychol,1993,61:984-991
  • 10[11]Oquendo MA, Friend JM, Halberstam B,et al. Association of comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder and major depression with greater risk for suicidal behavior. Am J Psychiatry,2003,160(3):580-2

共引文献6

同被引文献842

引证文献87

二级引证文献901

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部