期刊文献+

基于三角模糊的航空公司安全评估研究 被引量:9

Airline Safety Evaluation Based on Triangular Fuzzy Numbers
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文在综合考虑航空公司安全影响因素的前提下,建立了安全评估指标体系。由于评估过程中存在的不确定性,故利用模糊层次分析法确定指标体系的权重,基于三角模糊数建立安全评估模型。实证分析表明,利用模糊理论在航空公司安全评估中可以获得较为准确的评价结果。 The index system of airline safety evaluation is set up on the premise of considering the influence factor of safety synthetically. Because of the existing uncertainty in the evaluation process, the weight of the index system is confirrned by utiiizing the fuzzy analytic laierarchy process. The size of'the index system is represented by triangular fuzzy numbers. Then the safety evaluation model is built up.
机构地区 中国民航大学
出处 《电子科技大学学报(社科版)》 2009年第4期21-25,共5页 Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China(Social Sciences Edition)
基金 中国民航大学科研启动基金(07qd13x)
关键词 航空安全 模糊层次分析法 三角模糊数 评估 aviation safety fuzzy analytic hierarchy process triangular fuzzy numbers evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1CHANG Y H, YEH C H. A new airline safety index[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2004, 38(4): 369-383.
  • 2RICHARD C L. Applied Program of Aviation Safety Training for the Civil Aviation Flying College of China[C], 2000 World Aviation Conference, October 10-12, San Diego, CA, SAE 2000-01-5544.
  • 3EDKINS G D. The INDICATE safety program: evaluation of a method to proactively improve airline safety performance[J]. Safety Science,1998,30(3):275-295.
  • 4孙瑞山,刘汉辉.航空公司安全评估理论与实践[J].中国安全科学学报,1999,9(3):69-73. 被引量:42
  • 5王华伟,左洪福.航空公司安全评估研究[J].系统工程,2006,24(2):46-51. 被引量:30
  • 6陈团生,毛保华.改进TOPSIS法在航空公司安全评估的运用研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2005,1(4):70-73. 被引量:21
  • 7CHENG C H, YANG K L, HWANG C L. Evaluation Attack Helicopters by AHP Based on Linguistic Variable Weight[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1999, 116(2): 423-435.
  • 8KARA A L, PRASAD V P. A review of human error in aviation maintenance and inspection[J]. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics,2000,26(2): 133-161.
  • 9AURINO D E. Human factors and aviation safety what the industry has, what the industry needs[J]. Ergonomics, 2000, 43(7): 952-959.
  • 10BUCKLEY J J. Fuzzy hierarchical analysis[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1985, 17(3): 233-247.

二级参考文献27

  • 1张文修.不确定性推理原理[M].西安:西安交通大学出版社,1994.165-169.
  • 2刘汉辉 孙瑞山 等.航空公司安全评估系统.课题研究报告[M].中国民航学报,1995,11..
  • 3赵焕臣.层次分析法[M].北京:科学出版社,1996.85-96.
  • 4[2]Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods[J].European Journal of Operational Research Volume: 107, Issue: 3, June 16, 1998, pp. 507-529
  • 5[3]Deng, Hepu;Yeh, Chung-Hsing;Willis, Robert J. Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights[J] .Computers and Operations Research Volume: 27, Issue: 10, September, 2000, pp. 963-973
  • 6[8]Tsaur, Sheng-Hshiung;Chang, Te-Yi;Yen, Chang-Hua. The evaluation of airline service quality by fuzzy MCDM[J]. Tourism Management Volume: 23, Issue: 2, April, 2002, pp. 107-115
  • 7KotzS 吴喜之.现代贝叶斯统计学[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2000..
  • 8胡永宏 贺思辉.综合评价方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2002..
  • 9Chang Y H.The status and perspective of Taiwan's civil aviation safety[J].Civil Aviation Journal Quarterly,1999,1:1~24.
  • 10Bureau of transport and communication economics[Z].Quality of service in Australian passenger aviation.Research report 80,Australian Government Publishing Service,Canberra,1992.

共引文献82

同被引文献77

引证文献9

二级引证文献81

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部