期刊文献+

语言生物机制研究的新视野:FOXP2与人类语言能力 被引量:12

New Horizons in the Study on the Biological Mechanism of Language: FOXP2 and Human Language Faculty
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 语言的生物机制是生物语言学的核心议题,作为该领域的前沿成果之一,结构基因组学有关FOXP2基因与人类语言能力关系的研究有望为解决语言生物机制的争议性理论问题带来曙光。对KE家族和英国男孩CS的研究从共时角度审视了语言基因突变对人类语言使用及理解的重要影响;探索FOXP2的进化之旅则从历时角度揭示了语言基因对人类演进的重大意义。在此基础上,结构基因组学与语言进化比较研究法的结合可从侧面为回答广义/狭义语言能力与动物交流之间的关系提供科学证据,同时也使我们有理由相信广义语言能力可能还包括一个语言基因组系统。 The biological mechanism of language is the core topic of biolinguistics. As one of the frontiers in biolinguistics, the study on the relationship between FOXP2 and human language faculty belongs to structural genomics and may shed light on the controversial theoretical issues about the biological mechanism of language. The studies on KE family and a British boy named CS could examine the great impact of the mutation of the language gene on the use and understanding of human language. Besides exploring the evolution of FOXP2 may illustrate the significance of the language gene on how humans were evolved. Based on the above facts, the hybrid of structural genomics and comparative studies on EVOLANG may provide scientific evidence to answer how FLB and FLN are connected with animal communication. Furthermore, the facts also make us believe that FLB may also include a language genome system.
作者 董粤章 张韧
出处 《东北大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第4期355-359,共5页 Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)
关键词 语言生物机制 FOXP2基因 人类语言能力 biological mechanism of language FOXP2 gene human language faculty
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Miller G.What Is the Biological Basis of Consciousness[J].Science,2005,309:79.
  • 2Hauser M D,Chomsky N,Fitch T.The Faculty of Language:What Is It,Who Has It and How Did It Evolve[J].Science,2002,298:1569-1579.
  • 3张韧.平行式框架下的认知语义研究[J].外国语,2005,28(1):30-40. 被引量:6
  • 4Jenkins L.Biolinguistics:Exploring the Biology of Language[M].New York:CUP,2000.
  • 5Lenneberg E H.Biological Foundations of Language[M].New York:John Wiley and Sons,1967.
  • 6Chomsky N.Reflections of Language[M].New York:Temple Smith,1975.
  • 7Pinker S.The Language Instinct:How the Mind Creates Language[M].New York:Harper Collins,1994.
  • 8Lai CS L,Fisher S E,Hurst J A,et al.A Forkhead-domain Gene Is Mutated in a Severe Speech and Language Disorder[J].Nature,2001,413:519-523.
  • 9Pinker S.Talk of Genetics and Vice Versa[J].Nature,2001,413:465-466.
  • 10Fitch W T,Hauser M D,Chomsky N.The Evolution of the Language Faculty:Clarifications and Implications[J].Cognition,2005,97:179-210.

二级参考文献47

  • 1石定栩.汉语句法的灵活性和句法理论[J].当代语言学,2000,2(1):18-26. 被引量:44
  • 2申小龙.语文的阐释[M].沈阳:辽宁教育出版社,1992..
  • 3Golderg, Adele E. Jackendoff and construction-based grammar [J]. Cognitive Linguistics, 1996, 7( 1 ): 3-20.
  • 4Goldberg, Adele E. Constructions: a new theoretical approach to language [J]. Trends in Cognitive Science, 2003, 7(5): 219-224.
  • 5Gruber, Jeffery. Studies in Lexical Relations [D]. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT., 1965.
  • 6Holmes, Jasper and Richard Hudson. Constructions in Word Grammar [R]. Ms. University College London, 1999.
  • 7Hudson, Richard. Identifying the linguistic foundations for lexical research and dictionary design [A]. D. Walker, A. Zampolli and N. Calzolari. Automating the Lexicon: Research and practice in a Multilingual Environment [C]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986/1995. 21-52.
  • 8Jackendoff, Ray. Toward an explanatory semantic representation [J]. Linguistic Inquiry, 1976, 5,481-506.
  • 9Jackendoff, Ray. Semantics and Cognition [M]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1983.
  • 10Jackendoff, Ray. The status of thematic relations in linguistic theory [J]. Linguistic Inquiry, 1987, 18, 369-411.

共引文献5

同被引文献258

引证文献12

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部