期刊文献+

青少年手腕骨骨龄与生活年龄的差异观察 被引量:11

The observation of difference between skeletal age and chronological age with hand and wrist in Chinese Han adolescent
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较以不同骨龄标准所评价的青少年手腕骨骨龄与生活年龄的差异,观察生长发育长期变化对青少年年龄推测的影响。方法从中国5座大中城市抽取11464名(男5873,女5591)3~18岁汉族正常青少年儿童,并另随机抽取950名(男516,女434)12~18岁骨发育正常的汉族青少年作为验证样本。按CHN法和RC法骨龄标准评价手腕部X线片骨龄,并对不同方法评价的骨龄及生活年龄进行统计学分析。结果各年龄组CHN法骨龄中位数大于RC骨龄,其差异具有显著性意义(P<0.05)。验证样本中,在男12~16.5岁、女12~14.5岁之间,CHN骨龄减生活年龄之差值分别为0.35~1.00岁和0.57~1.16岁(P<0.01);RC骨龄减生活年龄的差值分别为-0.26~0.23岁和-0.27~0.06岁(P>0.05)。在男17~18岁、女15~17岁之间,CHN骨龄减生活年龄的差值分别为-0.52^-1.05岁和-0.16^-1.13岁(P<0.05),RC骨龄减生活年龄的差值分别为-0.35^-0.48岁和-0.22^-0.79岁(P<0.05)。结论CHN法骨龄高于生活年龄,在大部分年龄组RC骨龄与生活年龄基本一致。 Objective The age estimated by skeletal age of hand and wrist were compared between different standards in adolescent, in order to observe the effects of secular trend of skeletal development to age estimation. Methods The sample consisted of was 11464 (5873 boys, 5591 girls)normal urban Han children aged 3 - 18 years from cities of China in 2005 years. To verify the results in first sample, the control sample was consisted of 950 normal urban Han children aged 12 - 18 years. The radiographs of hand and wrist of all subjects were estimated by CHN and RC methods. The relations between skeletal age estimated by CHN or RC norm and chronological age were investigated. Results In the sample medians for CHN skeletal ages were advanced relative to RC skeletal age in every age group, there were significantly differences between them (P 〈 0.05 ). In control sample, from 12 ~ 16.5 years for boys and 12 ~ 14.5 years for girls, the differences of skeletal age minus chronological age were 0.35~ 1.00 years and 0.57 ~1.16 years (P 〈0.01) for CHN method, -0.26~0.23 years and -0.27 ~0.06 years (P 〉0.05) for RC method respectively; and from 17 ~ 18 years for boys and 15 ~ 17 years for girls, the differences of skeletal age minus chronological age were - 0. 52~ - 1.05 years and - 0. 16 ~ - 1. 13 years (P 〈 0.05 ) for CHN method, -0. 35 -0.48 years and -0. 22 ~0. 79 years (P 〈0.05) for RC method, respectively. Conclusions The chronological ages were overestimated by CHN skeletal age and the RC skeletal ages were generally coincided with chronological ages of a majority of age groups in the contemporary adolescent.
出处 《中国法医学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2009年第1期18-20,共3页 Chinese Journal of Forensic Medicine
关键词 法医人类学 年龄推测 手腕部 骨龄 青少年 forensic anthropology age estimation hand and wrist skeletal age adolescent
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献20

  • 1顾光宁,吴晓钟.中国人手与腕部之骨化[J].解剖学报,1962(2):173-184. 被引量:16
  • 2张绍岩,杨士增,邵伟东,黄耕培,欧建华,金寿光,黄惟军,纪庆科,吴惠茹.中国人手腕骨发育标准——CHN法[J].体育科学,1993,13(6):33-39. 被引量:34
  • 3欧阳镇 唐锡麟 等.肘部骨骼年龄判定方法的研究[J].中国法医学杂志,1987,2(1):81-81.
  • 4欧阳镇,中国法医学杂志,1987年,2卷,1期,81页
  • 5李国珍,中华放射学杂志,1979年,13卷,1期,19页
  • 6李果珍 张德苓 等.中国人骨发育的研究Ⅱ,骨龄百分计数法[J].中华放射学杂志,1979,13(1):19-19.
  • 7Greulich WW and Pyle IS.Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist.Stanford,California:Stanford University Press,1959.
  • 8Tanner JM and Whitehouse RH.Standard for skeletal maturity.Part Ⅰ.Paris:International Children's Centre 1959,1-20.
  • 9Tanner JM,Whitehouse RH and Healy MJR.A new system for estimating the maturity of the hand and wrist,with standards derived from 2600 healthy British children.Part Ⅱ.The Scoring System.Paris:International Children's Centre 1962,1-8.
  • 10Tanner JM,Oshman D,Bahhage F,and Healy MJR.Tanner-Whitehouse bone age reference values for North American children.J Pediatr,1997,131:34-40.

共引文献144

同被引文献111

引证文献11

二级引证文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部