期刊文献+

良性前列腺增生患者对中文版国际前列腺症状评分理解能力的调查 被引量:12

Men with the benign prostatic hyperplasia understanding about the Chinese International Prostate Symptoms Scores from a cross-sectional survey
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的了解不同文化背景条件下的良性前列腺增生(BPH)患者对中文版国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)理解能力的准确性。方法自2008年9月至10月间,对我院门诊及病房104例BPH患者进行中文版IPSS问卷调查,患者的年龄是58.90±15.41岁。分别按照其文化层次分为文盲组32例,年龄53.94±18.03岁,小学组23例,年龄61.87±15.15岁,中学组27例,年龄60.93±13.84岁,大学组22例,年龄60.55±12.31岁。首先,在门诊的候诊厅中让BPH的患者根据自己对调查表的理解力自评。然后,有一位泌尿外科医生对其每项条款进行解释,再结合患者的情况及病史做出评价,住院病人在病房调查方法同上。分析两种评分间结果的差异性。结果文盲组中第4项评分在两种评分间差异有显著性意义(P<0.05),但总分数在两种评分间比较的P=0.050。小学组中各项及总分数在两种评分之间差异无显著性意义(P>0.05)。中学组及大学组中各项评分及总分数在两种评分之间差异无显著性意义(P>0.05)。结论不同文化背景下患者对中文版IPSS的理解力同医生间差异无统计学意义,且文化层次越高理解的准确性越高。 Objective To investigate accuracy of understanding about the Chinese-International Prostate Symptoms Scores (IPSS) among men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) ranking culture. Methods A total of 104 outpatients and hospital patients (58.90±15.41) with BPH have administrated the questionnaire of Chinese-IPSS from September to October in 2008, ranked as illiterate 32 (53.94±18.03), elementary school 23 (61.87±15.15), high school 27 (60.93±13.84) and university group 22 (60.55±12.31) individuals, respectively. Firstly, patients administered the questionnaire by themselves. Furthermore, the urologist explanation each item ,base on patients' severity and history. Then, other special results were collected. In hospital, the same measurement was utilized. Finally, we analyzed the difference between them. Results In illiterate group there was significant difference between the two methods in the fourthscore (P〈0,05), however, the sum scores was no obvious difference (P=0.05). There were no significant differences in each and all items between them in primary school group(P〉0.05). Meanwhile, there were no obvious differences in each item and sum score in the other 2 groups(P〉0.05). Conclusion The patients with different educational levels understanding about CHINESE-IPSS were no significant differences; furthermore, the higher educational level was the exacter understanding.
出处 《安徽医学》 2009年第1期9-12,共4页 Anhui Medical Journal
关键词 良性前列腺增生 国际前列腺症状评分 差异性 Benign prostate hyperplasia International prostate symptoms scores Difference
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Denis L, Griffiths K, Khoury S, et al. Proceeding of the 2nd International Consultation on BPH. Plymouth, United Kingdora, Health Publication, 1998.
  • 2Barry M J, Fowler FJ, O'Leary MP, et al. The American urological association symptom index for benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol, 1992, 148:1549-57.
  • 3McConnell JD. Benign prostatic hyperplasia: treatment guidelines and patient classification. Br J Urol, 1995, 76: 29-46.
  • 4张士青,潘惟昕,盛兴标,厉建.S-L问卷短期复测的稳定性研究[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,1998,19(12):728-732. 被引量:4
  • 5Barry M J, Williford WO, Chang Y, et al. Benign prostatic hyperplasia specific status measures in clinical research: how much change in the American Urological Association symptom index and the benign prostatic hyperplasia impact index is perceptible to patients. J Urol, 1995, 154: 1770-4.
  • 6吉村亚希子 新美三由纪 大桥靖雄 等.International prostate symptom score[J].日泌尿会志,1997,88:1013-20.
  • 7Lujan M, Paez BA, Martin OE, et al. The validity of the IPSS questionnaire in a sample of 262 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Arch Esp Uro, 1997, 50(8): 847-53.
  • 8Rodrigues Netto N Jr, de Lima ML, de Andrade EF, et al. Latin American study on patient acceptance of the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) in the evaluation of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology, 1997, 49 (1): 46-9.
  • 9邵强,郭宇文,郭宏波,张玉海.BPH患者对中文版IPSS理解能力的评估[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2001,22(1):51-53. 被引量:20
  • 10Netto NR Jr, de Lima ML. The influence of patient education level on the International Prostatic Symptom Score. J Urol, 1995, 154: 97-9.

二级参考文献4

共引文献22

同被引文献107

引证文献12

二级引证文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部