摘要
目的:比较腹腔镜直肠癌根治和传统根治的临床疗效。方法:比较2007年3月—2007年9月行腹腔镜直肠癌根治术和传统直肠癌根治术各35例的出血量、手术时间、术后吗啡用量、术后住院时间,同时比较两者的淋巴结清扫数目和总住院费用。结果:腹腔镜组的出血量、术后吗啡用量和术后住院日明显少于传统手术组(P<0.05),两组手术时间、淋巴结清扫个数和总住院费用的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:与传统直肠癌根治手术相比,腹腔镜直肠癌根治术能达到开腹手术的水平,并且具有创伤小、术后恢复快等特点,极具推广价值。
Objective： To evaluate of the effect of Laparoscopic radical operation and traditional operation on rectal cancer. Methods：35 Laparoseopie and 35 traditional operation cases during the period of 2007.3 to 2007.9 were compared as to haemorrhage, operation time, used morphine,days in hospital after operation, the number of lymph nodes excised and the total fee. Results：In laparoscopic group, the haemorrhage, operation time, used morphine and days in hospital after operation were better compared with traditional operation group （P〈0.05）. While no difference was observed in operation time, the number of lymph nodes excised and the total fee （P〉0.05）. Conclusion：laparoscopic radical operation have the same radical effects compared with traditional radical operation in treating rectal carcinoma. And the patients who taken it got little trauma and recovered quickly.
出处
《中国临床医学》
北大核心
2008年第5期646-647,共2页
Chinese Journal of Clinical Medicine
关键词
腹腔镜
结直肠癌
根治
Laproscopy
rectal cancer
Radical effect
