期刊文献+

腹腔镜与开腹全直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的临床分析 被引量:12

Clinical study of laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision in treatment of medium and low rectal cancer
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的对比分析腹腔镜与开腹全直肠系膜切除(TME)术治疗中、低位直肠癌的疗效。方法回顾性分析我院2010年1月至2011年10月收治的162例中、低位直肠癌患者的临床资料,按手术方法分为腹腔镜组68例,开腹组94例。结果2组患者的保肛率、术中出血量、术后镇痛时间、术后排气时间、留置导尿管时间、术后住院时间等指标有明显统计学差异(P<0.05);而2组的手术时间、标本的大小、距下切缘距离、淋巴结数目等特征无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论腹腔镜治疗中、低位直肠癌具有出血量较少、胃肠道等消化系统和泌尿系统恢复效果好、疼痛较轻、并发症相对较少等优点,值得临床推广。 Objective To compare the efficacy of laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision(TME) in the treatment of medium and low rectal cancer.Methods Analyse the clinical datas of 162 patients with medium and low rectal cancer.All the patients were divided into two groups: 68 cases in laparoscopic group and the other 94 cases in laparotomy group.Results Indicators such as anal sphincter preservation rate,intraoperatve blood soss,postoperative analgesia,postoperative passage of flatus,indwelling catheter time and postoperative hospital stay of the two groups had a statistically significant difference(P0.05).However,the operative time,specimen size,distance away from the cutting edge,number of lymph nodes of the two groups had no significant differences(P0.05).Conclusion Laparoscopic which treats medium and low rectal cancer with less bleeding,better recovery of digestive system and urinary system and less complications is worthy of the clinical recommendations.
出处 《局解手术学杂志》 2013年第1期43-44,共2页 Journal of Regional Anatomy and Operative Surgery
关键词 腹腔镜 开腹术 中、低位直肠癌 全直肠系膜切除术 laparoscopy laparotomy medium and low rectal cancer total mesorectal excision
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献89

共引文献145

同被引文献91

  • 1Simon R.l,Rabin J, Kuhls D. Impact of increased use of laparoseapy on negative laparotomy rates after penetrating trauma [ J ]. J Trauma,2002, 53(2) :297 -302.
  • 2张连阳,赵松,李勇.腔镜技术在腹部创伤中应用的基础与临床研究[C].第四届全国创伤外科学术研讨会,2006:33-37.
  • 3卫生部医政司.结直肠癌诊疗规范(2010年版)[S].2010:21-23.
  • 4Gouvas N,Tsiaoussis J,Pechlivanides G. Laparoscopic or open surgery for the cancer of the middle and lower rectum short-term outcomes of acomparative non-randomised study[J].{H}International Journal of Colorectal Disease,2009,(7):761-769.
  • 5Kang SB,Park JW,Jeong SY. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREANtrial):short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial[J].{H}LANCET ONCOLOGY,2010,(7):637-645.
  • 6NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology-Rectal Cancer Guideline[S].2011:4.
  • 7Jayne DG,Thorpe HC,Copeland J,et al.Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer[J].Br J Surg,2010,97(11):1638-1645.
  • 8Kang SB,Park JW,Jeong SY,et al.Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy(COREAN trial):short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial[J].Lancet Oncol,2010,11(7):637-645.
  • 9Park JS,Choi GS,Jun SH,et al.Laparoscopic versus open intersphincteric resection and coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer:intermediate-term oncologic outcomes[J].Ann Surg,2011,254(6):941-946.
  • 10Lelong B,Bege T,Esterni B,et al.Short-term outcome after laparoscopic or open restorative mesorectal excision for rectal cancer:a comparative cohort study[J].Dis Colon Rectum,2007,50(2):176-183.

引证文献12

二级引证文献122

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部