期刊文献+

贵阳市居民生活供水状况改善的支付意愿 被引量:7

Estimating Willingness to Pay of Guiyang Residents for Improvement of Tap Water Supply
原文传递
导出
摘要 贵阳市西郊水厂于2002年建成并投入使用,为了解和评价该建设项目的实施效果,于2006年11月进行了该水厂主要供水区域的受益者问卷调查。本文主要关注与贵阳市生活用水水价相关的条件估值法(CVM)调查部分。比较了贵阳市居民生活用水供水状况在西郊水厂建成前后的变化,调查数据显示水量和水质都发生了有益的变化,两配对样本的Wilcoxon符号秩检验方法进一步得出水质在这4年多时间有了显著的改善。计算出贵阳市居民对于4年间水量和水质改善的人均支付意愿(WTP)为在2002年水价基础上增加0.50元/t。对WTP和可能对其产生影响的潜在因素进行了相关分析,Kendall s tau-b相关系数结果显示影响WTP的主要因素有被调查者的月收入和年龄。分析了导致WTP产生偏差的原因及为避免和减少偏差所采取的措施。研究结果可以为贵阳居民生活用水水价改革提供一些参考。 Guiyang West Water Plant began to provide tap water in 2002. In order to evaluate the effect of this project, we designed and conducted a questionnaire in the main regions supplied with tap water in November 2006. In this paper, we focus on the Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) questions related to water price. First, the present situation of water supply for Guiyang citizens was compared with that prior to FY 2002. The survey data showed that both water quality and water supply in FY 2006 are better than they were prior to FY 2002, and the Wilcoxon rank sum test verified a significant change in water quality in Guiyang over this period. Then, we calculated the mean Willingness To Pay (WTP) of citizens for improvements in both water quality and water supply over the four years, and the result was an increase of 0.48 yuan RMB/ton water from 2002 when the water price was 1 yuan RMB/ton. Next, we conducted a correlation analysis for the relationship between WTP and some potential influential factors, and the result of Kendall's tau-b correlation coefficient shows that the major factors affecting WTP are income and age. Finally, some biases which influence mean WTP were inspected and countermeasures taken for avoiding or alleviating the biases were reported. The results of this study can be used as a reference for the reformation of water prices in Guiyang.
出处 《资源科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2008年第10期1478-1483,共6页 Resources Science
基金 日本国际协力银行(JBIC)项目:"贵阳西郊水厂建设项目后评价受益者调查" 北京市教育委员会共建项目建设计划资助项目(编号:SYS100270430)
关键词 居民生活供水 支付意愿 水价 条件估值法 贵阳市 Contingent valuation method Willingness to pay Water price Guiyang City
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献89

  • 1赵军,杨凯,邰俊,吴阿娜.上海城市河流生态系统服务的支付意愿[J].环境科学,2005,26(2):5-10. 被引量:80
  • 2张茵,蔡运龙.条件估值法评估环境资源价值的研究进展[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2005,41(2):317-328. 被引量:130
  • 3李金平,王志石.澳门噪音污染损害价值的条件估值研究[J].地球科学进展,2006,21(6):599-604. 被引量:7
  • 4郝吉明,何东全,傅立新,等.澳门城区机动车污染评价研究.第一届澳门环境与城市发展研讨会科学论文集.澳门:澳门基金会出版,1999,18-29
  • 5[11]Bateman I J, Langford I H, Turner R K,et al. Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studies[J]. Ecological Economics, 1999, 12:161-179.
  • 6[12]Bonnieux F, Rainelli P. Contingent valuation methodology and the EU institutional framework [A]. In: Bateman I J, Willis K G, eds. Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developing Countries[C]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999. 585-612.
  • 7[13]Carson R T. Valuation of tropical rainforests: Philosophical and practical issues in the use of contingent valuation [J]. Ecological Economics, 1998, 24: 15-29.
  • 8[14]Loomis J B, Kent P, Strange L, et al. Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: Results from a contingent valuation survey [J]. Ecological Economics, 2000, 33: 103-117.
  • 9[15]Jorgenson B S, Wilson M A, Heberlein T A. Fairness in the contingent valuation of environmental public goods: Attitude toward paying for environmental improvements at two levels of scope [J]. Ecological Economics, 2001, 36(1): 133-148.
  • 10[17]Lovett A, Bateman I J. Economic analysis of environmental preferences: Progress and prospects [J]. Computer, Environment and Urban systems, 2001, 25: 131-139.

共引文献587

同被引文献78

引证文献7

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部