中国内地教师继续教育中的权力关系与教师领导被引量：23

Power Relations and Teacher Leadership in Teachers' Continuing Education in the Chinese Mainland

下载PDF

导出

摘要在教师专业发展中最少有三股权力在运作:教育行政部门代表的国家的权力,大学专家具有的权威和教师作为专业群体的自主。教师作为专业群体的自主是教师领导的主要内涵之一。很多在教师继续教育中出现的表面现象与问题,如教师进修的积极性不高、教师培训的质量不佳都与教师领导在三者的权力关系中受到压抑有关。本文分析了中国内地教师继续教育中国家-专家-教师三方的权力关系,并指出教师领导的现状与未能顺利发展的原因,最后提出建议。 As the New Curriculum Reform proceeds to its second stage, the key roles of teachers in curriculum implementation are increasingly recognized by policy makers and researchers. Consequently, teachers＇ professional development has become the focus of a series of major policies and projects. However, nagging questions remain as to whether teachers are empowered by such measures, especially by officially sanctioned institutionalized learning. From the perspective of teacher leadership, this paper attempts to examine the power relations between the state, university experts and school teachers to illuminate the obstacles for a teacher-led professional development.

作者卢乃桂陈峥

机构地区香港中文大学教育研究所武汉大学教育科学学院

出处《复旦教育论坛》 CSSCI 2008年第5期61-66,共6页 Fudan Education Forum

关键词教师继续教育教师领导权力关系 teachers＇ continuing education teacher leadership power relations

分类号 G451.1 [文化科学—教育技术学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献12

1[1]American Federation of Teachers(1995).Prlnciples for Professional Development.Washington,D.C.:Author.
2[2]Foueault,M.(1977).Discipline and punish,trans.Alan Sheridan;London:Penguin.
3[3]Guskey,T.R.(1995).Professional Development in Education:In Search of the Optimal Mix.In T.R.Guskey and M.Huberman (Eds.).Professional Development in Education:New Paradigms and Practice.New York:Teachers College,Columbia University.
4[4]Hargreaves,A.(1995).Development and desire,a postmodern perspective.In T.R.Guskey,& A.M.Huberman(eds.),Professional development in education:new paradigms and practices.New York:Teacher College Record.
5[5]Hawley,W.D.& Valli,L.(1999).The Essentials of Effective Professional Development:A New Consensus.In Darling-Hammond,L.ete.(Eds.)Teaching as the learning profession:handbook of policy and practice.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass Publishers.pp.127-150.
6[6]Hodges,H.LB.(1996).Using Research to Inform Practice in Urban School:Ten Key Strategies for Success.In Educational Policy,10(2),pp.223-252.
7[7]Jeffrey,R.J.;Woods,P.(1996).Feeling deprofessionalized:the social construction of emotions during an OFSTED inspection.Cambridge Journal of Education,vol.26,no.3,1996.
8[8]Maxwell,T.W.(1991).Curriculum consultant.In A.Lewy(ed.),The international encyclopedia of curriculum(pp.357-359).Oxford:the Pergman Press.
9[9]Pink W.T.& Hyde,A.A.(1992).Doing Effective Staff Development.In W.T.Pink and A.A.Hyde(Eds.)Effective Staff Development for School Change.Norwood,N.J.:Ablex.
10[10]Smylie,M.A.(1995).Teacher Learning in the Workplace:Implication for School Reform.In T.R.Guskey and M.Huberman (Eds.).Professional Development in Education:New Paradigms and Practice.New York:Teachers College,Columbia University.

二级参考文献9

1卢乃桂,陈峥.作为教师领导的教改策略——从组织层面探讨欧美的做法与启示[J].教育发展研究,2006,26(17):54-57. 被引量：39
2周淑卿.课程发展与教师专业[M].中国台北:高等教育文化事业有限公司,2004.57.
3Clark, C. M.. Teachers as Designers in Self-directed Professional Development [ A ]. In Hargreaves, A & Fullan, M. (Eds.). Understanding Teacher Development [C]. New York: Teachers' College Press, 1992.
4Connelly, F. M. & Clandinin, D. J.Teachers as Curriculum Planners: Narratives of Experience [ M ]. Columbia, Teachers College, 1988.
5Holmes, M.. Bring about Change in Teachers: Rationistic Technology and Therapeutic Human Relation in the Subversion of Education [ R], paper presented to the International Conference on Teacher Development in Toronto, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, 1989, February.
6Lightfoot, S. L.. On Goodness of Schools: Themes of Empowerment [ J ], Peabody Journal of Education, 1986, 63(3):9-28.
7Richardson, V. and Placier, P.. Teacher Change. In Richardson (Eds.). Handbook of Research on Teaching (4th Ed. ). Washington, D. C. : American Education Association. 2001, 905 - 946.
8xx市xx区教育局文件[Z]．
9中华人民共和国教育部．关于做好中小学骨干教师国家级培训工作的通知(教师[2001]1号)[Z]．