期刊文献+

ITC裁定对华反倾销案件时具有歧视性吗 被引量:9

Is There Any Discrimination in the Process that ITC Ruling Antidumping Cases toward China
原文传递
导出
摘要 文章旨在考察美国国际贸易委员会(ITC)在裁定对华反倾销案件过程中受哪些因素的影响,是否具有针对中国的歧视性。通过对1980年至2005年ITC裁定对华反倾销案件结果和影响因素的经验分析,得出结论:案件申诉者的政治势力对裁定结果发挥着至关重要的影响;ITC对于是否构成损害的裁定结果强烈依赖于案件是否专对中国发起;其他政治经济因素均不能对裁定结果产生显著影响。 This paper explores which factors affect U.S. Intemational Trade Commlsslons (ITC) decision-making process of antidumping cases toward China. After running the empirical analysis on the ruling outcomes and various factors of U.S. antidumping cases toward China filed from 1980 to 2005, this paper draws conclusions as follows. The political power of petitioners is a vital factor af- fecting the ruling outcomes. The determinations of "whether the domestic industry is being injured" depend on whether the case is solely toward China. Other economic and political factors have not brought significant impacts on ruling outcomes.
作者 王孝松
出处 《国际贸易问题》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第9期114-120,共7页 Journal of International Trade
基金 国家社科基金项目"中美经济贸易依存度对中美双边关系的影响和制约研究"(项目号05BGJ006)的阶段性成果
关键词 ITC 对华反倾销 歧视性 Probit方法 ITC Antidumping toward China Discrimination Probit Model
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1李坤望,王孝松.申诉者政治势力与美国对华反倾销的歧视性:美国对华反倾销裁定影响因素的经验分析[J].世界经济,2008,31(6):3-16. 被引量:56
  • 2刘向丽,张驰.我国出口贸易摩擦预警机制的现状、问题与对策[J].国际商务(对外经济贸易大学学报),2006(4):42-45. 被引量:13
  • 3Anderson, Keith B., (1993) “Agency Discretion or Statutory Direction: Decision Making at the US International Trade Commission,”Journal of Law and Economics 36: 915-35
  • 4Robert E. Baldwin, (1985) The Political Economy of U.S.Import Policy. Cambridge: MIT Press
  • 5Robert E. Baldwin and Jeffrey W. Steagall, (1994) "An Analysis of ITC Decisions in Antidumping, Countervailing Duty and Safeguard Cases," Wdltwirtschaftliches Archiv 130:290-308.
  • 6Chad E Bown, Rachel McCulloch, (2005)“U.S, Trade Policy toward China: Discrimination and Its Implications,”Paper for Presentation at the PAFTAD 30 Conference at the East-West Center in Honolulu, February.
  • 7DeVauh, James M., (1993) "Economics and the International Trade Commission," Southern Economic Journal 60 (2) :463-78.
  • 8Finger, J. Michael, H. Keith Hall, and Douglas R. Nelson, (1982) "The Political Economy of Administered Protection," American Economic Review 72: 452-66.
  • 9Hansen, Wendy L. and Thomas J. Prusa, (1996)“Cumulation and ITC Decision Making: The Sum of the Parts is Greater than the Whole,”Economic Inquiry 34 (4) : 746-69.
  • 10Hansen, Wendy L. and Thomas J. Prusa, (1997)“The Economics and Politics of Trade Policy: An Empirical Analysis of ITC Decision Making,”Review of International Economics 5 (2) : 230-45.

二级参考文献20

  • 1http ://www. trinity.edu/bhirsch/unionstats/.
  • 2Baldwin, Robert E. The Political Economy of U. S. Import Policy. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1985.
  • 3Baldwin, Robert E. and Moore, Michael O. "Political Aspects of the Administration of the Trade Remedy Laws,"in Richard Boltuck and Robert E. Litan eds. , Down in the Dumps: Administration of the Unfair Trade Laws. Washington, DC. : The Brookings Institution, 1991, pp. 253 - 280.
  • 4Becker, Gary S. "A Theory of Competition among Pressure Groups for Political Influence. " The Quarterly Journal of Economics ,98,1983, pp. 371 -400.
  • 5Blonigen, Bruce A. "Evolving Discretionary Practices of US Antidumping Activity. " NBER Working Paper, 2003, W9625.
  • 6Boltuck, Richard and Litan, Robert E. (Eds.) Down in the Dumps: Administration of the Unfair Trade Laws. Washington, DC. : The Brookings Institution, 1991.
  • 7Bown, Chad P. and McCulloch, Rachel. “U. S. Trade Policy Toward China: Discrimination and Its Implications. ” Paper for presentation at the PAFTAD 30 conference at the East - West Center in Honolulu, February. 2005.
  • 8Brock, William A. and Magee, Stephen P. “The Economics of Special Interest Politics: The Case of the Tariff.” American Economic Review, 68, 1978, pp. 246 - 250.
  • 9Evans, Carolyn L. and Sherlund, Shane M. Are Antidurnping Duties for Sale? Case - Level Evidence on the Grossman - Helpman Protection for Sale Model. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, International Finance Discussion Papers. No. 888
  • 10Gallaway, Michael P. ; McDaniel, Christine A. and Rivera, Sandra A. "Short - run and Long - run Industry - level Elasticities of U. S. Armington Elasticities. " The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 2003, 14.

共引文献67

同被引文献105

引证文献9

二级引证文献99

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部