期刊文献+

美国反倾销贸易保护效应的实证分析 被引量:2

An Empirical Study of Trade Protective Effects of U.S.Anti-Dumping
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过建立美国各年向各涉案国家的进口额与反倾销申诉、反倾销措施及相关影响因素的回归模型,考察了1995-2008年美国发起的反倾销申诉和采取的反倾销措施对所有57个涉案国家和地区进口的影响。运用广义矩法对最小二乘估计的结果进行修正发现,虽然美国当期的进口主要由历史进口因素决定,但其反倾销申诉与措施会造成当期进口总额的显著下降,下降比例分别达到7.198%和5.890%,美国反倾销保护效应使美国年均进口额下降近1757亿美元,中国每年向美国的出口额减少超过127亿美元。 Through establishing a regression model of the United States' imports,anti-dumping complaints,anti-dumping measures against all involved countries,and related factors,this paper examines the impact of U.S.anti-dumping initiations and measures on imports of 57 involved countries and regions from 1995 to 2008.Using the GMM method to amend the results of least squares estimation,it is found that the U.S.current imports were mainly determined by the historical import factors,but the anti-dumping initiations and measures resulted in a significant decline in total current imports by 7.198% and 5.890%,respectively.And the protective effect of U.S.anti-dumping made its average annual import volume drop by nearly $175.7 billions;China's exports to the United States reduced by more than $12.7 billions each year.
作者 杨仕辉 邵骏
出处 《商业经济与管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第6期57-65,共9页 Journal of Business Economics
关键词 反倾销申诉 反倾销措施 贸易保护效应 广义矩法 anti-dumping initiation anti-dumping measure trade protective effects generalized method of moments
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献97

共引文献199

同被引文献47

  • 1鲍晓华.反倾销措施的贸易救济效果评估[J].经济研究,2007,42(2):71-84. 被引量:144
  • 2Davies,S.W..McGuinness A.J..Dumping at Less Than Marginal Cost[J].Journal of International Economics,1982,12:169-182.
  • 3Brander,J.A.,Krugman,P.A..‘Reciprocal Dumping’Model of International Market Share Rivalry[J].Journal of Inter-national Economics,1983,18:83-100.
  • 4Brander,J.A.,Spencer,B.J..Tacit Collusion,Free Entry and Welfare[J].The Journal of Industrial Economics,1985,3:277-295.
  • 5Staiger,R.W.,Wolak,F.A..The Effect of Domestic Antidumping Law in the Presence of Foreign Monopolist[J].Journalof International Economics,1992,32:265-287.
  • 6Prusa,T.J..Why Are So Many Antidumping Petitions Withdrawn?[J].Journal of Internatinal Economics,1992,33:1-20.
  • 7Tharakan P K M.Is Anti-dumping Here to Stay?[J].The World Economy,1999,2:179-206.
  • 8Messerlin,P.A..The EC Antidumping Regulations:A First Economic Appraisal[J].Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv,1989,125(3):563-587.
  • 9Krupp,C.M.,Pollard,P.S..Market Responses to Antidumping Laws Some Evidence from the U.S.Chemical Industry[J].The Canadian Journal of Economics,1996,29(1):199-227.
  • 10Prusa,T.J..The Trade Effects of U.S.Anti-dumping Actions[A].in Feenstra,ed.,The Effects of US Trade Protectionand Promotion Policies[C].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1997:191-213.

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部