期刊文献+

体脂分布类型与身体机能、素质的关系:福建省3个城市7614人调查 被引量:5

Relationship between body fat distribution and physical functions and quality: A survey of 7 614 persons in 3 cities of Fujian province
暂未订购
导出
摘要 背景:肥胖对健康的损害与脂肪分布有关,体质评价不仅要评价全身脂肪的数量,还要重视脂肪的分布。近年来体质量指数和腰臀比的评价在健康和体质研究领域越来越受到重视。目的:根据体质量指数和腰臀比进行体脂分型,观察体脂分布对身体机能和素质的影响。设计、时间及地点:横断面调查,于2005—07/08在福建师范大学体育科学学院及福建省体育科研所完成。对象:按整群随机抽样的原则从福州、厦门、三明3个城市中抽取20~59岁居民7614人,以10岁为1个年龄组。按照国内成年人体质量指数、腰臀比的分类标准分为外周型非超重组、中心型非超重组、外周型超重组及中心型超重组。方法:按照2005年国民体质监测工作手册的要求,对7614名成年人进行调查。项目包括年龄、性别、身高、体质量、腰围、臀围、收缩压、舒张压、肺活量、台阶指数、握力、背力、坐位体前屈、闭眼单脚站立、纵跳、俯卧撑、仰卧起坐和反应时。主要观察指标:观察不同体脂分布类型调查对象的血压变化、高血压患病率及机能、素质指标的总体变化;分析体质量指数、腰臀比与各指标的相关性。结果:①中心型超重组的收缩压、舒张压以及高血压患病率明显高于外周型超重组和外周型非超重组(P〈0.01)。②中心型超重组的台阶指数、坐位体前屈、闭眼单脚站立、纵跳、俯卧撑和仰卧起坐各指标显著低于外周型非超重组(P〈0.01);中心型超重组的握力、背力显著高于外周型非超重组(P〈0.01)。③体质量指数、腰臀比与收缩压、舒张压和背力呈显著正相关(P〈0.01):与坐位体前屈、纵跳、俯卧撑、仰卧起坐和单眼闭脚站立呈显著负相关(P〈0.01)。结论:成人体脂分布有性别以及身体机能、素质指标的差异,但总体以中心型超重组对身体机能、素质影响最大;即使是非超重组,中心型分布对机能、素质也产生一定的影响。 BACKGROUND: The obesity harm to health is related to fat distribution, physical fitness evaluation not only evaluates the quantity of total body fat, but also evaluates fat distribution. In recent years, body mass index and waist-hip ratio evaluation attracts more and more attentions in the health and physical fitness field. OBJECTIVE: To do body fat classification based on body mass index and waist-hip ratio and to observe the effects of body fat distribution on physical functions and quality. DESIGN, TIME AND SETTING: The cross-sectional study was done at the Physical Education Science Institute of Fujian Normal University and Fujian Institute of Sport Scientific Research between July 2005 and August 2005. SUBJECTS: 7 614 persons were randomly selected from inhabitants, 20-59 years, in Fuzhou, Xiamen and Sanming cities, every 10 years as a age group. They were divided into peripheral non-overweight group, central non-overweight group, peripheral overweight group and central overweight group according to the classification criteria of adult body mass index and waist-hip ration in China. METHODS:According to the regulations of National Physical Fitness Monitoring Directory in 2005, a survey was carried out among the adult aged 20-59 years in 3 cities of Fujian. The questionnaire included age, sex, body height, body mass, waist circumference, hip circumference, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), vital lung capacity, steps index, grasp strength, dorsum strength, body anteflexion in sitting position, stand in one leg with eyes closed, vertical jump, push-up, sit-up and reaction time. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Blood pressure change, overall change of physical function and quality indexes, and morbidity rate of hypertension in subjects with different body fat distribution types; correlation between body mass index, waist-hip ration and each index. RESULTS: Systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and morbidity rate of hypertension were markedly higher in the central overweight group than that in the peripheral overweight group and peripheral non-overweight group (P 〈 0.01); steps index, body anteflexion in sitting position, stand in one leg with eyes closed, vertical jump, push-up and sit-up were markedly lower in the central overweight group than that in the peripheral non-overweight group (P 〈 0.01); grasp strength and dorsum strength were markedly higher in the central overweight group than that in the peripheral non-overweight group (P 〈 0.01); body mass index and waist-hip ration were positively correlated with systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and dorsum strength (P 〈 0.01), and were negatively correlated with body anteflexion in sitting position, vertical jump, push-up, sit-up and stand in one leg with eyes closed (P 〈 0.01). CONCLUSION: Adult body fat distribution has differences in gender and physical function and quality indexes, but totally body fat distribution of subjects in the central overweight group has the maximum effect on the physical function and quality; even in the central non-overweight group, the central distribution of body fat also has certain influence on the physical function and quality.
出处 《中国组织工程研究与临床康复》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第33期6550-6553,共4页 Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research
基金 “2005年福建省三城市国民体质现状监测及分析”福建省科技厅计划项目(2005D057)~~
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献4

共引文献179

同被引文献64

  • 1朱婉宁,李绍军,刘璐玮.大学生瘦体重与运动能力的相关性研究[J].运动,2012(13):62-63. 被引量:5
  • 2秦念阳.发展柔韧素质[J].长江师范学院学报,2003,22(S1):122-123. 被引量:14
  • 3刘静,吴兆苏,赵冬.自由脂肪酸与代谢综合征的关系[J].心肺血管病杂志,2005,24(2):125-127. 被引量:5
  • 4叶真,陈清云,陈兴红.对重庆市实施《学生体质健康标准》女生力量项目的意见商榷[J].重庆交通学院学报(社会科学版),2005,5(4):117-119. 被引量:2
  • 5石敏.侗族食品“腌肉”的营养成分分析[J].黔东南民族师范高等专科学校学报,2006,24(6):53-54. 被引量:4
  • 6Harman E A,Gutekunst D J,Frykman P N,et al.Prediction of simu-lated battlefield physical performance from field-expedient tests[J].Mil Med,2008,173(1):36-41.
  • 7Williams A G,Wilkinson M.Simple anthropometric and physical per-formance tests to predict maximal box-lifting ability[J].J StrengthCond Res,2007,21(2):638-642.
  • 8Denton S J,Kerr C J,Savory L A,et al.Physical activity levels andbody composition:Significant predictors of cardiorespiratory fitness in10-14 year old schoolchildren[J].Obes Rev,2011,12(Suppl 1):189.
  • 9Craig B N,Congleton J J,Kerk C J,et al.Correlation of injury occur-rence data with estimated maximal aerobic capacity and body composi-tion in a high-frequency manual materials handling task[J].Am IndHyg Assoc J,1998,59(1):25-33.
  • 10Garrido-Chamorro R P,Sirvent-Belando J E,Gonzalez-Lorenzo M,etal.Correlation between body mass index and body composition in eliteathletes[J].J Sports Med Phys Fitness,2009,49(3):278-284.

引证文献5

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部