摘要
在信息化时代,大学培养的人才应当具备自主学习能力、创新能力、较强的适应能力、批判反思能力。而现行的大学学生评价模式存在着评价手段单一、评价内容偏颇、评价结果功利化、重共性轻个性等弊端,从而妨碍了学生独立获取知识的能力的发展、学生创新精神和创新能力的培养、学生个性充分自由的发展。针对这些弊端,研究者们提出了若干大学生评价模式以改进现有评价模式。笔者认为,无论从什么角度来探讨学生评价,新的大学生评价模式的构建应遵循开放性、灵活性和民主性的原则。开放性原则从一个立体的角度来评价学生已经取得的成绩;灵活性原则体现在评价形式方法的多样化以及评价指标的具体化,采取了多手段、多方面考察学生发展情况的方法,而不是仅以认知为主要评价目标,体现了教育评估的诊断、督促、激励和自律功能;民主性原则要求我们在对学生实施学业和行为评价时采取包容的态度,尊重学生的个体差异。这些原则确立了大学生在评价中的主体地位,通过科学合理的评价,促进大学生的全面发展。
In the age of information, the university students ought to be capable of the ability of studying independently, the innovation ability, the stronger adaptive capacity and the reflectively criticizing ability. But in the current appraising mode of university students, there are shortcomings as the on-track appraising means, the partial appraising contents, making the appraising result utility, attaching importance to universal but lighting personality and so on. These have hindered the development of ability to obtain knowledge independently, the cultivation of the student initiative spirit and innovation ability, and the development of students'individual character. Directing against the shortcomings, researchers have raised a certain number appraising mode of university students to improve current appraising mode of university students. During construction of new appraising mode for uni- versity students, we should follow the principle of the opening, flexibility and democracy. We use the flexibility principle to inspect students'development from many - faceted and multiple means, and attend to the individual diversity of students, not to use cognition as only appraisal goal. We should conceive the containing aptitude to exercise the student learning and behavior to respect students'individual differences of the appraisal. These principles establish the main body status and improve the full-scale development of university students by the scientific appraisal.
出处
《徐州师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
2008年第3期118-122,共5页
Journal of Xuzhou Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
能力
大学生评价模式
原则
ability
appraising mode of university students
principle