期刊文献+

反垄断从宽处理制度及其中国化 被引量:18

The Leniency Program in Anti-monopoly Law and Its Sinolization
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 反垄断从宽处理制度旨在减免公法责任以吸引卡特尔成员主动投案并揭发他人的违法事实,是国际上通行的一种发现和打击卡特尔的有效机制。从宽处理制度分为多种类型,其共同的先决条件有三个,即:提出申请、提供有效信息、完全配合反垄断执法机构的查处。中国具有与该制度相契合的传统法律土壤,也具备建构该制度的现实法律依据。但是,我国反垄断法律体系内部的冲突、执法权归属的模糊、行政法律责任的薄弱与缺失等因素,使得该制度在中国的实施面临隐忧。 Diminishing or exempting public law responsibility to persuade cartel members to surrender or charge against other person' s illegal acts, the leniency program in anti-monopoly law has proved itself as an effective mechanism available internationally to investigate and crack down on cartels. Although the leniency program can be divided into many categories, all of them have to meet three requirements : applying for leniency firstly, offering reliable information, and cooperating with anti-monopoly authorities. China has a legal tradition similar to the program and has a solid legal foundation conducive to establishing such a program. However, the program' s carrying out may be hindered because of conflicts within antimonopoly statutory framework, lack of specific provision that who shall exercise the enforcement power and the fact that some executive personnel have no sense of law and responsibility.
作者 李俊峰
机构地区 上海大学法学院
出处 《现代法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第2期70-79,共10页 Modern Law Science
基金 上海高校选拔培养优秀青年教师科研专项基金项目"私人实施反垄断法问题研究"(编号B.37-0106-07-702)
关键词 反垄断 卡特尔 从宽处理 中国化 anti-monopoly cartel lenient treatment Sinolization
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1OECD. Report on Leniency Programmes to Fight Hard Core Cartels : Using Leniency to Crack Hard - Core Cartels. [R/OL]. (2001 -04 -27) [2007 -05 - 12]. http://www. oecd. org/dataoecd/49/16/2474442, pdf.
  • 2First. The Vitamins Case: Cartel Prosecution and the Coming of International Competition Law [ J ]. Antitrust Law Journal, 2001, 68 (3): 711 -712.
  • 3Alan Riley. Beyond Leniency Enhancing Enforcement in EC Antitrust Law [ J ] , World Competition, 2005, 28 (3) : 378.
  • 4OECD. Report on the Nature and Impact of Hard Core Cartels and Sanctions against Cartels under National Competition Laws [ R/OL ]. ( 2002 - 04 - 08 ) [ 2007 - 6 - 11 ]. http ://www. oecd. org/dataoecd/16/20/2081831, pdf.
  • 5周振想.当代中国的罪与罚[M].北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,1999.
  • 6马晓芳.电信网通开始竞合游戏3月起互不进入对方领地[N].第一财经日报,2007-02-27(C1).
  • 7李方平,王利平.请求信产部调查中国电信、中国网通“握手言和”的公开信[N].南方周末,2007-06-07(B11).
  • 8王健.威慑理念下的反垄断法刑事制裁制度——兼评《中华人民共和国反垄断法(修改稿)》的相关规定[J].法商研究,2006,23(1):3-11. 被引量:62
  • 9郑鹏程.美国反垄断刑事政策及其对我国反垄断立法的启示[J].甘肃政法学院学报,2006(5):95-100. 被引量:20
  • 10王鄂东.“坦白从宽”在英国[J].公安研究,2004(7):90-94. 被引量:2

二级参考文献44

共引文献76

引证文献18

二级引证文献71

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部