期刊文献+

论克隆人的尊严问题 被引量:19

On the Problem of Dignity in Human Cloning
原文传递
导出
摘要 Ethical issues in human cloning cannot be adequately understood without taking the problem of dignity as the central concern. Kantian notion of dignity sets the starting point for our discussion of the issue, and the two versions of "Categorical Imperative" are specifically applied to the case in order to analyze how a cloned human being’s dignity must have already been violated by the clone initiator before the birth of the cloned human being. Such an issue of dignity is separated from that of happiness, and it is more fundamental than of happiness. Finally, the consideration of such an issue of dignity should take precedence over any other considerations. Ethical issues in human cloning cannot be adequately understood without taking the problem of dignity as the central concern. Kantian notion of dignity sets the starting point for our discussion of the issue, and the two versions of 'Categorical Imperative' are specifically applied to the case in order to analyze how a cloned human being’s dignity must have already been violated by the clone initiator before the birth of the cloned human being. Such an issue of dignity is separated from that of happiness, and it is more fundamental than of happiness. Finally, the consideration of such an issue of dignity should take precedence over any other considerations.
作者 翟振明 刘慧
出处 《哲学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第11期94-101,共8页 Philosophical Research
基金 "985工程"建设项目"行动计划"(编号04178)的资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1亨利·阿特朗,马克·奥热,米雷耶·戴尔马-马尔蒂,罗歇-波尔·德鲁瓦,纳迪娜·弗雷斯科,2003年.《人类克隆》,依达、王慧译,社会科学文献出版社.
  • 2康德,2002年.《道德形而上学原婵》,苗力田译,上海人民出版社.
  • 3林亚西,2001年.《谁生谁死:论科技发展对生命伦理学的挑战》,国家图书馆博士论文库.
  • 4维蒙·赛尼暖,2002年.《克隆人》,高树榕,房英译,上海译文出版社.
  • 5翟振明,2003年.《意义是如何超越经验的》,载《中国哲学与现象学评论》93特辑.
  • 6翟振明.康德伦理学如何可以接纳对功利的考量[J].哲学研究,2005(5):80-85. 被引量:10
  • 7Kass,Leon R. ,2003, "Thoughts on cloning", in The New York Times, 24 January .
  • 8Zhai, Zhenming, 1994, The Radical Choice and Moral Theory, Kluwer Academic Publishers.

二级参考文献4

  • 1Hare, R. M. , 1997, "Could Kant have been a Utilitarian?", in Sorting Out Ethics, Oxford University Press.
  • 2Kant, Immanuel, 1959, Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. Lewis White Beck, Macmillan Publishing Company.
  • 31993, Critique of Practical Reason, trans. Lewis White Beck, Macmillan Publishing Company.
  • 4Mill, John Stuart, 1979, Utilitarianism, Hackett Publishing Company.

共引文献10

同被引文献203

引证文献19

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部