矛盾态度的概念、测量及其相关因素被引量：27

A Review of the Development of Research on Ambivalent Attitude

下载PDF

导出

摘要该文主要就目前国外社会心理领域关于一般矛盾态度和种族、性别等具体方面特定矛盾态度的研究进展进行了介绍分析。矛盾态度是指个体或群体对某种态度目标同时存在积极和消极的认知评价和情绪情感体验及其程度。其具体测量方法多种多样,主要有直接测量和间接测量两大类。相关研究主要涉及矛盾态度的前因变量和结果变量,及其对行为的预测强度等方面。 This paper introduced and discussed the development of research on general ambivalent attitude and specific ambivalent attitude on race, gender, etc. The concept of ambivalent attitude refers to the simultaneously existence and its degree of positive and negative evaluations and feelings to an attitude object. The operations of ambivalent in current researches were variety, included direct and indirect measurements. The relevant researches mainly concentrated on its antecedents, consequences and strength, etc.

作者陈志霞陈剑峰

机构地区华中科技大学社会学系

出处《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2007年第6期962-967,共6页 Advances in Psychological Science

基金美国普林斯顿大学国际合作项目教育部人文社科基金(05JA630018)

关键词矛盾态度认知失调矛盾种族态度矛盾性别偏见 ambivalent attitude, cognition dissonance, ambivalent race attitude, ambivalent sexism

分类号 B849 [哲学宗教—应用心理学] C91 [经济管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献25

1Fiske S T. Social Beings: A Core Motives Approach to Social Psychology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2004.
2Jonas K, Broemer P, Diehl M. Attitudinal ambivalence. In: Stroebe W, Hewstone M. European Review of Social Psychology.Vol.11. UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2000.
3Priester J R, Petty R E. The gradual threshold model of ambivalence: Relating the positive and negative bases of attitudes to subjective ambivalence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996, 71(3): 431-449.
4Tompson M M, Zanna M P, Griffin D W. Let's not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. In: Petty R E & Krosnick J A (Eds.). Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences. Mahwah, N J: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1995.
5Conner M, Sparks P. Ambivalence and attitudes. In: Stroebe W, Hewstone Med. European Review of Social Psychology. Vol. 12.UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2002.
6Maio G R, Esses V M, Bell D W. Examining conflict between components of attitudes: Ambivalence and inconsistency are distinct constructs. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 2000, 32(1): 58-70.
7Kaplan K J.On the ambivalence-indifference problem in attitude theory and measurement: A suggested modification of the semantic differential technique. Psychological Bulletin, 1972, 77: 361-372.
8Bell D W, Eeeses V M, and Maio G R. The utility of open-ended measures to assess intergroup ambivalence. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 1996, 28(1): 12-18.
9Krause E D, Robins C J, Lynch T R. A mediational model relating sociotropy, ambivalence over emotional expression, and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 2000, 24: 328-35.
10Czopp A M, Monteith M J. Thinking well of African Americans: Measuring complimentary stereotypes and negative prejudice, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 2006, 28(3): 233-250.