摘要
黑哨”是指裁判员非法收受他人财物而在比赛中不公正履行裁判职责的行为。目前,对于“黑哨”行为的定性,理论界和实践部门内部都存在争议,理论界主要存有“无罪论”、“公司、企业人员受贿罪论”和“受贿罪论”三种不同的论点。为了解决实践中出现的争议,统一司法工作,有必要由立法机关做出立法解释。此外,也可以在有关的法律文件中对“黑哨”行为构成“受贿罪”加以确认。
'Black Whistle' refers to the behaviors that the referees accept bribes and make unjust judgment in the competition. At present, disputes about the nature of 'Black Whistle' exist in ci,'cles of theory and inside the practice departments. There are mainly such three different arguments in circles of theory, zs 'theory of innocence', 'themy of employees accepting bribe in company and enterprise' and 'theory of accepting bribe' it is necessary to interpret the legislation by legislative organs in order to resolve the disputes in practice and unify the judicature work. In addition, we can confirm the 'Black-whistle' behaviors as crimes of accepting bribe in relative documents.
出处
《湖南公安高等专科学校学报》
2007年第1期30-33,共4页
Journal of Huan Public Security College
关键词
黑哨
观点争议
问题的解决
black-whlstle
opinion controversy
resolution of the problem