摘要
隐性知识与显性知识的科学界定是知识管理理论发展与实践的基础。目前,研究者根据三个标准对其进行了划分和定义,即可表、易表和已表标准。但根据Nonaka的SECI模型分析其提出的面包机案例,可发现这三种划分方法都不同程度地存在局限性。而且,通过该案例可以确立新的对隐性知识与显性知识划分的标准,即是否已经通过文字、公式、图形等表述或者是否已经通过语言、行为表述并体现于纸、光盘、磁带、磁盘等客观存在的载体介质上。
The scientific definition of tacit knowledge and explicit knowledge is the foundation for the development and practice of knowledge management theory. At present, three standards of defining knowledge has been laid down, namely, whether the knowledge can be expressed, whether it is easy to be expressed and whether it has been expressed. But a case study of break maker based on Nonaka＇s SECI model indicates that the three standards have varied limitations. Meanwhile, the case study finds new standards, namely, whether the knowledge has been expressed via word, formula or diagram, or whether it has been expressed via language and behavior and has existed on the paper, or in CD-ROM, cassette or disk.
出处
《西南交通大学学报（社会科学版）》
2007年第3期118-121,共4页
Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University(Social Sciences)
基金
国家自然科学基金资助项目(70272044)
关键词
隐性知识
显性知识
知识链
SECI模型
tacit knowledge
explicit knowledge
knowledge chain
SECI model
