期刊文献+

两种麦蚜取食诱导小麦抗性品种后对后来取食蚜生物学特性的影响 被引量:9

Effect of resistant wheat attacked by previous aphids on biological characteristics of subsequent aphids
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 刺吸式昆虫在刺吸作物韧皮部取食后会影响作物的正常生长发育,随着作物抗性及昆虫种类的不同,作物反过来也会对昆虫造成或正或反的影响,然而一种刺吸式昆虫取食后对后来者有什么样的影响目前尚不确定。本研究通过严谨的实验方法,即选定3个不同国家的小麦抗性品种98-10-30、Amigo和Batis,在所有条件严格统一的人工智能控制温室内,通过各处理在同一植株上先后不同的接蚜方式,分别测定了麦二叉蚜Schizaphis graminum(Rondani)和麦长管蚜Sitobion avenaeFab.在前期被蚜虫危害的抗虫品种98-10-30、Amigo和Batis上的发育历期、体重差及相对日均体重增长率(mean relative growthrate MRGR)等生物学参数。结果表明:品种不同,蚜虫在不同处理条件下取食作物时受到的影响也不同,即在品种98-10-30上,通过与前期不接虫的对照及前期接不同麦蚜的相关处理比较,麦长管蚜对后期取食的麦二叉蚜(MRGR=0.0974±0.0071)具有抑制作用,而麦二叉蚜对后期取食的麦长管蚜(MRGR=0.1614±0.0048)却有促进作用;在品种Amigo上,前期麦蚜的危害对麦长管蚜的取食具有促进作用,而在品种Batis上前期危害对麦二叉蚜的取食具有促进作用。同时明确了3个品种对两种蚜虫的抗性状况,即在前期无蚜虫危害时,品种98-10-30和Batis对两种麦蚜的抗性相当;在前期有麦蚜危害时,品种98-10-30对麦二叉蚜的抗性较好,而品种Batis对麦长管蚜的抗性较好;品种Amigo无论在任何处理下均对麦二叉蚜的抗性较好。 Accumulated evidence shows that penetration insect attack may induce changes in host plant quality, and this will affect the normal growth and development of crops. With the change of crops resistance and insect variety, in turn, crops will cause positive or negative impact on insects. However, few studies have investigated the consequences of induced plant response due to previous insect attack on phloem-feeding insects. Herein we address whether the feeding behaviour and growth of a phloem-feeding insect are affected by host plant changes with scientific research methods using three varieties resistant wheat 98-10-30, Amigo and Batis, which are from three different countries. We measured respectively the development duration(DD), weight difference (dW) and mean relative gowth rate (MRGR) of Sitobion avenae Fab. and Schizaphis graminum (Rondani). The results showed that the aphids were either restrained or promoted when they fed on different treatment crops, compared with the control not fed by aphids and the corresponding treatment previously fed by different aphid species. S. avenae restrained the growth of S. graminum ( MRGR = 0.0974 ±0.0071 ) on 98-10-30, but S. graminum promoted the growth of S. avenae ( MRGR = 0.1614 ± 0.0048) on 98-10-30. Penetrations of aphids promoted the growth of S. avenae on Amigo, while promoted growth of S. graminum on Batis. In addition this study suggested that the wheat variety 98-10-30 and Batis had the same resistance when no aphids fed on them. However, the variety 98-10-30 had better resistance for S. graminum, and the variety Batis had better resistance for S. avenae when they were fed by aphids. The variety Amigo had better resistance for S. graminum under all situations.
出处 《昆虫学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第2期197-201,共5页 Acta Entomologica Sinica
基金 中德农业合作项目(2004/2005(03)) 国家自然科学基金项目(39970112 30470268) 陕西省科委重点项目(2001SM01)
关键词 麦长管蚜 麦二叉蚜 诱导 抗性品种 发育历期 相对日均体重增长率 Sitobion avenae Schizaphis graminum induce resistance variety developmental duration mean relative growth rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Adams JB,van Emden HF,1972.The biological properties of aphids and their host plant relationships.In:van Emden HF ed.Aphid Technology.Academic Press,London.47-104.
  • 2Agrawal AA,2000.Specificity of induced resistance in wild radish:causes and consequences for two specialist and two generalist caterpillars.Oikos,89:493-500.
  • 3Agrawal AA,Karban R,2000.Specificity of constitutive and induced resistance:pigment glands influence mites and caterpillars on cotton plants.Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata,96:39-49.
  • 4Cailaud CM,Dedryver CA,Simon JC,1994.Reproductive potential of the cereal aphid Sitobion avenae on resistant wheat lines (Triticum monococcum line).Annals of Applied Biology,125:219-232.
  • 5Cattaghan TV,Indley DK,Lovett DL,1986.Modular growth and function in the vascular cryptogam Lycopodium annotinum.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London,228:195-206.
  • 6陈巨莲,倪汉祥,孙京瑞,程登发.小麦几种主要次生物质对麦长管蚜几种酶活力的影响[J].昆虫学报,2003,46(2):144-149. 被引量:41
  • 7Dorschner KW,Ryan JD,Johnson RC,Eikenbary RD,1987.Modification of host nitrogen levels by the greenbug (Homoptera:Aphididae):its role in resistance of winter wheat to aphids.Environmental Entomology,16:1 007-1 011.
  • 8Formusoh ES,Wilde GE,Reese JC,1992.Reproduction and feeding behavior of greenbug biotype E (Homoptera,Aphididae) on wheat previously fed upon by aphids.Journal of Economic Entomology,85:789-793.
  • 9Gonzáles WL,Ramírez CC,Olea N,Niemeyer HM,2002.Host plant changes produced by the aphid Sipha flava:consequences for aphid feeding behaviour and growth.Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata,103:107-113.
  • 10Havill NP,Raffa KF,1999.Effects of elicitation treatment and genotypic variation on induced resistance in Populus:impacts on gypsy moth (Lepidoptera:Lymantriidae) development and feeding behavior.Oecologia,120:295-303.

二级参考文献22

  • 1陈巨莲.麦类作物抗蚜性研究[J].世界农业,1993(8):28-29. 被引量:16
  • 2武予清,刘芹轩,高宗仁,钟昌珍.棉花品种的抗螨机制研究[J].中国农业科学,1996,29(3):1-7. 被引量:19
  • 3阎凤鸣,李松岗,许崇任,林昌善.丁布对亚洲玉米螟的拒食作用及生长发育的影响[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),1996,32(2):254-260. 被引量:10
  • 4陈巨莲 丁红建 等.主要抗蚜小麦品种(系)的抗性类型及其生化抗性机制[J].昆虫学报,1997,:190-194.
  • 5Ding H, Lamb J, Ames N, 2000. Inducible production of phenolic acids in wheat and antibiotic resistance to Sitodiplosis mosellana. J. Chem. Ecol., 26 (4): 969 - 985.
  • 6Dreyer D L, Jones K C, Malyneux R J, 1985. Feeding deterrency of some phrrolizidine, indolizidine and quinolizidine alkaloids towards pea aphid ( Acyrthosiphon pisum ) and evidence for phloem transport of indolizidine alkaloid swainsonine. J. Chem. Ecol., 11: 1 045.
  • 7Ishaaya I, Swirski E, 1976. Trehalase, invertase and amylase activities in the black scale, Saissetia oleae, and their relation to host adaptability. J. Insect Physiol., 22: 1 025 - 1 029.
  • 8Leszczynski B, Dixon A F G, 1992. Resistance of cereals to aphids: The interaction between hydroxamic acids and glutathine S-transferase in the grain aphid Sitobion avenae (F.) (Hom., Aphididae). J. Appl . Entomol., 113:61 - 67.
  • 9Leszczynski B, Matok M, Dixon A F G, 1994. Detoxification of cereals plant allelochemicals by aphids: activity and molecular weights of glutathine S-transferase in three species of cereal aphids. J. Chem. Ecol., 20(2): 387 - 394.
  • 10Lindroth R L, 1989. Host plant alteration of detoxi cation activity in Papilio glaucus glaucus. Entomol. Exp. Appl., 50: 29-35.

共引文献59

同被引文献143

引证文献9

二级引证文献51

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部