期刊文献+

舌癌阴性淋巴结的微转移与临床病理及预后的相关分析 被引量:4

Correlation analysis of micrometastases and clinicopathological factors and prognosis in tongue cancer with histopathological negative lymph nodes
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:探讨舌癌患者颈部阴性淋巴结中的微转移与临床病理因素的关系及对预后的影响。方法:对60例舌癌患者经常规病理检查为阴性的淋巴结,采用免疫组化结合连续切片方法行微转移检测,χ2检验用于检验各临床病理因素与微转移之间的关系,Kaplan-Meier曲线用于描述有、无微转移2组患者的生存曲线分布,Logrank检验用于分析两者之间有无显著性差异,Cox回归用于分析包括微转移在内的各临床病理因素是否为影响预后的独立因素。结果:临床病理因素(年龄、性别、pT分期、肿瘤分级、原发灶浸润深度)与微转移之间无显著相关性(Ρ>0.05);有微转移和无微转移2组患者的3年生存率分别为77.7%和86.0%,无显著性差异(Ρ=0.235)。结论:微转移与临床病理因素之间无显著相关性,包括微转移在内的临床病理因素不能作为影响舌癌预后的独立因素。 PURPOSE: To analyse the relations between micrometastases and clinicopathological factors and to determine the influence on prognosis in tongue cancer with histopathological negative nodes. METHODS: A method combined with IHC and serial sectioning was used to detect the micrometestases of negative lymph node by routine histological examination of 60 patients with tongue cancer. The relationship between clinicopathological type and micrometastases was detected with a Chi-square test .The equality of survival curves was assessed with Log rank test.Cox' proportional hazard model was used to identify whether the clinicopathological factors,including micrometastases were independently associated with prognosis of tongue cancer. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant correlations between micrometastases and the clinicopathological features as follows: sex, age, pT stage,grade of differentiation,depth of primary tumor invasion (P〉0.05). The 3-year survival rates of patients with and without micrometastases were 77.7% and 86.0%,no statistically significant correlations were noted (P=0.235). CONCLUSIONS: Micrometastases and clinicopathological factors have no significant correlations and they are not independent prognostic factors in tongue cancer.
出处 《中国口腔颌面外科杂志》 CAS 2006年第5期341-344,共4页 China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
关键词 舌癌 微转移 病理学 预后 Tongue cancer Micrometastases Pathology Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献15

  • 1刘少臣,赵福运,贲呈瑞.影响舌鳞癌淋巴结转移的临床和病理因素评价[J].中华口腔医学杂志,1996,31(5):259-262. 被引量:25
  • 2屠规益.舌活动部麟状上皮癌的治疗探讨Ⅱ外科或综合治疗[J].中华肿瘤杂志,1985,7:33-35.
  • 3冯正虎 张文峰 赵怡芳.舌癌浸润方式与淋巴结包膜外侵犯的关系及临床意义.中国颅颌面外科,2003,2:45-45.
  • 4[1]O-charoenrat P, Pillai G, Patel S, et al. Tumour thickness prediets cervical nodal metastases and survival in early oral tongue cancer[J]. Oral Oncol, 2003,39(4):386-390.
  • 5[3]Gonzales-Moles M A, Esteban F, Rodriguez-Archilla A, et al.Importance of tumour thickness measurement in prognosis of tongue cancer[J]. Oral Oncol, 2002,38(4): 394-397.
  • 6[4]Pindborg J J, Reichart P A, Smith C J, et al. Histological typing of cancer and precancer of the oral mucosa [M]. Second Edition.New York: Springer-Verlag Berlin heideberg, 1997:11-12.
  • 7[5]Hermanek P, Sobin L H. TNM classification of malignancy tumors[M]. The Fourth Edition, New York: Springer-Verlag Berlin heideberg, 1992:14-17.
  • 8[6]Po Wing Yuen A, Lam KY, Lam LK, et al. Prognostic factors of clinically stage Ⅰ and Ⅱ oral tongue carcinoma-A comparative study of stage, thickness, shape, growth pattern, invasive front malignancy grading, Martinez-Gimeno score, and pathologic features[J]. Head Neck, 2002,24(6):513-520.
  • 9[7]Asakage T, Yokose T, Mukai K, et al. Tumor thickness predicts cervical metastasis in patients with stage Ⅰ / Ⅱ carcinoma of the tongue[J]. Cancer, 1998, 82(8):1443-1448.
  • 10[9]Buckley JG, Maclennan K. Cervical node metastases in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer: a prospective analysis of prevalence and distribution[J]. Head Neck, 2000, 22(2):380-385.

共引文献87

同被引文献38

引证文献4

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部