东亚开放地区主义的演进与中国的作用被引量：24

The Evolution of Open Regionalism in East Asia and China

导出

摘要冷战期间传统地区主义在欧洲盛行,尽管亚太地区合作所奉行的“新地区主义”有利于发展中国家融入世界经济体系,但也可能在某种程度上损害它们的利益。东亚区域一体化进程启动后,包括中国在内的东亚国家所奉行的“开放地区主义”的理念,既注重区域内的合作,又强调对区域外国家和国际组织的开放。它在某种程度上有回归传统地区主义的色彩,但更是新地区主义的超越。这一理念已成为当今国际关系中的普遍现象,对未来国际秩序的建构将会发挥重要作用。 During the period of the Cold War, traditional regionalism prevailed in Europe. The concept of “new regionalism” was pursued in the process of Asia-Pacific regional cooperation. This concept is relevant to the developing countries involved in the world economic system, but, in the meantime, their national interests, to some extent, might be impaired. After the beginning of East Asian regional integration, countries in the region, including China, adopted the concept of “open regionalism,”which provided guidance in focusing on mutual cooperation in the region and also attached importance to the linkages with the outside powers and regional organizations. The concept of open regionalism is based on traditional regionalism, but, additionally, it has special implications beyond the new regionalism. This concept is regarded as a pragmatic doctrine in other regions of the world as well. Consequently, it will be helpful to create a rational order of international relations.

作者苏浩

机构地区外交学院外交学系

出处《世界经济与政治》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第9期43-51,共9页 World Economics and Politics

关键词地区主义东亚合作新地区主义开放地区主义

分类号 F731 [经济管理—产业经济] D822.3 [政治法律—外交学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献38

1Lan Clard, Globalization and International Relations Theory, Oxford:Oxford University Press, 1999.
2苏浩.《东亚区域合作机制的建立及其对地区国际关系的影响》，载袁鹤龄主编.《全球化与地区化：亚洲地区经济发展的契机与挑战》，台北：鼎茂图书出版股份有限公司，2003年版，第60页.
3庞中英.地区化、地区性与地区主义——论东亚地区主义[J].世界经济与政治,2003(11):8-13. 被引量：50
4[美]卡尔·多伊奇著周启朋郑启荣译.《国际关系分析》[M].世界知识出版社,1992年版.第344-345页.
5Norman D. Palmer, The New Regionalism in Asia and the Pacific, Mass. : Lexington Books, 1991, p. 5.
6Martin Griffiths and Terry O' Callaghan, International Relations:The Key Concepts, London : Routledge, 2002, p. 273.
7Helge Hveem, "Explaining the Regional Phenomenon in an Era of Globalization," in Richard Stubbs and Geoffrey R. D. Underhill, eds. , Political Economy and the Changing Global Order, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000, pp. 1 - 80.
8Peter J. Katzenstein, "Regionalism and Asia," New Political Economy, Vol. 5, No. 3, 2000, p. 354.
9Shaun Breslin, Richard Higgot and Ben Rosamond, "Regions in Comparative Perspective," in Shaun Breslin, et al. , eds. , New Regionalism in the Global Political Economy, London: Routledge, 2002, pp.13 -14.
10刘兴华.地区认同与东亚地区主义[J].现代国际关系,2004(5):18-22. 被引量：40

二级参考文献44

1耿协峰.“新地区主义”研究—不同视角的评析[J].世界经济与政治,2001(1):21-25. 被引量：13
2Peter J. Katzanstein, "Regionalism and Asia", New Political Economy, Vol.5, No.3, 2000, p.354.
3Stuart Harris, "Asian Multilateral Institutions and Their Response to the Asian Economic Crisis: The Regional and Global Implications",Pacific Review, Vol. 13, No.3, 2000, p.500.
4Peter J.Katzenstein,"Regienalism and Asia", New Political Economy, Vol.5, No.3, 2000, p.355.
5Terry Narrance,"Communities and Citizens: Identity and Difference in Discourses of Asia - Pacific Regionalism", Citizenship Studies,Vol.2, No.1, 1998, p.81.
6Mark Beeson,"Southeast Asia and the Politics of Vulnerability",Third World Quarterly, Vol.23, No.3, 2002, p.559.
7Alexander Wend t, Social Theory of International Politics,Cambridge University Press, 1999, p.224.
8Paul Kowert and Jeffrey Legro, "Norms, Identity, and Their Limits: A Theoretical Reprise", in Peter J. Katzenstein ed., The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, New York:Columbia University Press, 1996, p.453.
9Alexander Wendt, SodalTheory of International Politics, p. 337.
10.《东亚研究集团最终报告》[EB/OL].东盟秘书处网站:http :// www.aseansec. Org/ viewpdf . Asp ? File = / pdf/ easg. pdf,.