期刊文献+

2001~2005年间医院内感染念珠菌败血症45例临床研究 被引量:8

Retrospective study of candidemia in 45 patients from 2001 to 2005
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:探讨念珠菌败血症的临床特点、菌株构成、危险因素及治疗转归。方法:收集2001~2005年间血培养念珠菌阳性的临床病例资料进行回顾性分析。结果:血培养念珠菌阳性共45例,以白色念珠菌为主,其次为热带念珠菌,病原学长期趋势显示白色念珠菌呈下降趋势,而非白色念珠菌逐年上升;药物敏感试验表明耐氟康唑白色念珠菌占58.3%。所有病例均有严重基础疾患,长期使用广谱抗生素(93.3%)、血管内置管(37.3%)为主要易感因素;老年、嗜中性粒细胞减少、低白蛋白血症、肾功能衰竭、感染性休克、多重感染是预后不良的信号。氟康唑为主要治疗药物,总病死率55.6%。结论:氟康唑不能作为所有念珠菌感染的首选药物,应重视病原学及药物敏感试验,合理选用抗真菌药物,采用综合性治疗措施,早期、足量、足疗程进行抗真菌治疗。 Objective:To investigate the etiology, clinical characteristics, risk factors and outcome of candidemia. Methods: The clinical data of 45 cases of blood cultivation positive patients from January 2001 to December 2005 were analyzed retrospectively. Results. Among 45 cases, the most frequently isolated organism was C. albicans (37.8%), followed by C. tropicalis. Secular trends in etiology showed a sustaining decrease of C. albicans and increase of non-albicans Candida responsibly. Haematological disease was the most common underlying condition. The majority of the cases had received 3 or more broad-spectrum antibiotics (93.3%) and intravascular catheters (37.3%). The risk factors for high motality included age, neutropenia, hypoadlbuminemia, renal failure and septic shock. Fluconazole was the main therapeutic method to treat candidemia. The overall mortality of candidemia was 55.6%. Conclusion: Fluconazole can not be the first choice for all candidemia. The blood culture and the drug sensitive test should be performed routinely to provide proper evidence for antifungal therapy. Effective and reasonable therapeutics are the guarantee for reducing the mortality of the candidemia.
出处 《南京医科大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第9期795-798,共4页 Journal of Nanjing Medical University(Natural Sciences)
关键词 念珠菌败血症 危险因素 抗真菌药物 病死率 candidemia risk factors antifungal drugs mortality
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献19

  • 1屈玲,府伟灵,徐永涛,陈鸣.166例真菌感染分离鉴定及药敏试验结果分析[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2004,14(1):110-112. 被引量:109
  • 2杜斌,张海涛,陈德昌,刘大为,侯百东,熊雯,刘彤华,陈杰.3447例尸检病例的深部真菌感染分析[J].中华医学杂志,1996,76(5):352-354. 被引量:119
  • 3[1]Wenzel RP. Nosocomial candidemia: risk factors and attributable mortality[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 1995, 20: 1531-1534
  • 4[2]Dean DA, Burchard KW. Surgical perspective on invasive Candida infections[J]. World J Surg, 1998, 22: 127-134
  • 5[3]Nguyen MH, Peacock JE Jr, Morris AJ, et al. The changing face of candidemia: Emergence of non-candida albicans species and antifungal resistance[J]. Am J Med, 1996, 100: 617-623
  • 6[4]Nucci M, Colombo AL. Risk factors for breakthrough candidemia[J]. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 2002, 21 : 209-211
  • 7[5]Mermel LA, Farr BM, Sherertz RJ, et al. Guidelines for the management of intravascular catheter-related infections[J]. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2001, 22:222-244
  • 8[6]Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ, Jones RN, et al. International surveillance of bloodstream infections due to candida species: frequency of occurrence and in vitro susceptibilities to fluconazole,ravuconazole, and voriconazole of isolates collected from 1997 through 1999 in the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2001, 39: 3254-3259
  • 9[7]Bech-Sague C, Jarvis WR, Secular trends in the epidemiology of nosocomial fungal infections in the United States, 1980-1990.National Nasocomial Infections Survillance System[J]. J Infect Dis, 1993, 167: 1247-1251
  • 10[9]Mckinnon PS, Goff DA, Kern JW, et al. Temporal assessment of candida risk factors in the surgical intensive care unit[J].Arch Surg, 2001, 136:1401-1408

共引文献15

同被引文献52

引证文献8

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部