摘要
目的评估被调查者对电子版问卷的反应性以及评价电子版问卷的等效性。方法面对面调查。由被调查者自填问卷；两样本的随机交叉对照试验：方便样本，包括高校普通人群（50例）和社区疾病人群（100例）；主要工具是纸质版和基于QL—Recorder软件的电子版SF-36。结果基于QL-Recorder软件的中文SF-36电子版在一般人群中具有良好的接受性，在社区使用的接受性很好。在纬度水平，电子版和纸质版具有很高的分值等效性：除了GH纬度，其他7个纬度两版本分值间差异均无显著性意义（P〉0．05）；GH纬度两版本的差异仅为2．33，〈5％的标准。在单个被调查者水平，电子版的等效性也比较理想：精确一致性为64％-99％；总体一致性为72％-99％；77％的Kappa系数属于“好一致性”及以上，23％的Kappa系数属于“中等一致性”。结论本研究验证了基于QL—Recorder软件的SF-36电子版问卷的接受性和等效性，能够代替纸质版。此外，也验证了SF-36电子版的优点：完成时间快，数据没有缺失值、质量高，数据的结果直观并且能够马上得到结果，数据的兼容性好，能直接输出到其他软件包。
Objective To assess the responses of informants to an electronic questionnaire, and evaluate the equivalent of the electronic questionnaire. Methods With face - to - face survey, the informants filled the questionnaires by themselves. The two samples＇ randomized cross controlled was used. Convenience sample consists of 50 common populations in college arid 100 patients in community. The main survey tools are paper version of SF - 36, and electronic version of SF - 36 based on the QL - Recorder. Results The Chinese SF - 36 based on the QL - Recorder is well accepted in general population and community population. In group level, we got high score equivalence for both versions： Except for GH item, the average - difference between two versions for the other seven items is no statistical significance （ P 〉0. 05 ）. The average - difference between two versions for the GH item is 2. 33 which is less than the criterion of 5%. In individual interviewee level, we got ideal results for score equivalence of the electronic version： Percentage of exact agreement located between 64% and 99%. Percentage of global agreement located between 72% and 99%. 77% of Kappa coefficients belonged to＂ good agreement＂ or above, and 23% of Kappa coefficients belonged to＂ middle agreement＂. Conclusion This study approved the acceptance and equivalence of the electronic Chinese SF -36 based on the QL -Recorder, and confirmed that the paper version could be substituted by the electronic version. Furthermore, this study validated the merit of the electronic Chinese SF - 36, i. e. ： Quick to finish, no missing of data with a higher quality, direct in getting result with good data compatibility, and direct in exporting data to other software.
出处
《中国全科医学》
CAS
CSCD
2006年第15期1231-1234,共4页
Chinese General Practice
