期刊文献+

苯巴比妥钠和东莨菪碱术前用药对丙泊酚意识消失CP_(50)的影响 被引量:8

The effect of premedication with phenobarbital sodium and scopolamine on CP_(50)of propofol target- controlled concentration
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的确定术前用药和年龄对50%患者意识消失所需要的靶控丙泊酚浓度(CP50)的影响。方法156例ASAⅠ~Ⅱ级患者随机分为有术前用药组(n=72)和无术前用药组(n=84),每组再均分为18~39岁、40~59岁和60~85岁三个年龄亚组,患者随机接受预先设定的靶控丙泊酚浓度,以镇静/警觉评分(0AA/S)评估镇静程度,OAA/S≤3分认为意识消失。结果有术前用药组和无术前用药组CP50和95%患者意识消失的靶控浓度(CP95)分别为2.02、3.47和2.38、4.20μg/ml(P〈0.05);术前用药轻度降低18~39岁组的CP50而CP95显著降低(P〈0.05),40~59岁组CP50和CP95均显著降低(P〈0.05),60~85岁组CP50显著降低(P〈0.05)但CP95仅轻度降低。除无术前用药组18~39岁和40~59岁亚组间CP50差异无显著意义,年龄亚组间CP50和CP95差异均有显著意义(P〈0.01)。结论年龄和术前用药均是影响丙?白酚靶控输注药效学的显著因子。 Objective To study the effect of premedication and age on CP50 of propofol targetcontrolled concentration. Methods One hundred and fifty-six patients ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱ were divided into premedication group and non-premedication group. According to age,each group was divided into subgroups 18-39 yr, 40-59 yr and 60-85 yr. Each patient randomizelly received preestablished propofol target-concentration, which was maintained for at least 8 rain. Sedation level was evaluated with OAA/S. OAA/S≤3 was defined as unconsciousness. Results CP50 and CP95 were 2.02μg/ml, 3.47 μg/ml and 2.38μg/ml, 4.20μ/ml in group premedication and non-premedication, respectively (P〈 0.05). CP50 and CP95 decreased significantly in premedication group (P〈0.05) except for CP50 in subgroups 18-39 yr and CP95 in subgroup 60-85 yr. CP50 and CP95 had significant difference between age groups (P〈0.05) except for CP50 between subgroups 18-39 yr and 40-65 yr in non-premedication group. Conclusion Premedication and age are the factors highly influencing on propofol pharmacodynamics.
出处 《临床麻醉学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2006年第7期499-501,共3页 Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology
关键词 药效学 丙泊酚 药物输注系统 Pharmacodynamics Propofol Drug delivery system
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献28

  • 1[1]Nakata Y, Goto T, Saito H, et al. Plasma concentration offentanyl with xenon to block somatic and hemodynamic response to surgical incision. Anesthesiology, 2000, 92:1043.
  • 2[2]Vinik HR, Bradley EL, Kissin I. Isobolographic analysis ofpropofol-thiopental hypnotic interaction in surgical patients.Anesth Analg, 1999, 88: 667.
  • 3[3]Short TG, Chui PT. Propofol and midazolam act synergistically in combination. Br J Anaesth , 1991,67: 593-545.
  • 4[4]Vuyk J, Engbers FHM, Lemmens HJM, et al. Pharmacodynamics of propofol in female patients. Anesthesiology, 1992,77:3-9.
  • 5[5]Schuttler J, Ihmsen H. Population pharmacokinetics ofpropofol: a multicenter study. Anesthesilogy, 2000, 92: 727.
  • 6[6]Kazama T, Takeuchi K, Ikeda K, et al. Optimal propofolplasma concentration during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in young, middle-aged, and elderly patients. Anesthesiology, 2000, 93: 662.
  • 7[1]Marsh B,White M,Morton N,et al.Pharmacokinetic model driven infusion of propofol in children[J].Br J Anaesth,1991,67(1):41-48.
  • 8[2]Tackley RM,Lewis GT,Prys-Roberts C,et al.Computer controlled infusion of propofol[J].Br J Anaesth,1989,62(1):46-53.
  • 9[3]Shafer AS,Doze VA,Shafer SL,et al.Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol infusions during general anesthesia[J].Anesthesiology,1988,69(3):348-356.
  • 10[4]Coetzee JF,Glen JB,Wium CA,et al.Pharmacokinetic model selection for target controlled infusions of propofol.Assessment of three parameter sets[J].Anesthesiology,1995,82(6):1328-1345.

共引文献77

同被引文献47

引证文献8

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部