期刊文献+

坎地沙坦与福辛普利对高血压疗效的观察 被引量:4

Observation of candesartan and fosinopril in the treatment of hypertension
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的 前瞻性评估坎地沙坦治疗原发性高血压的降压疗效和安全性。方法 130例轻中度原发性高血压患者随机服用坎地沙坦4~8mg或福辛普利10~20mg共20周,服药前后行动态血压监测(ABPM),观察24h收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)、谷峰比值、下一次给药前6h血压变化、降压有效率和不良反应。结果 坎地沙坦和福辛普利均能有效降低血压,20周治疗有效率分别为74%和73%(P〉0.05),坎地沙坦谷峰比值较福辛普利高(SBP:79%VS63%,P〈0.05;DBP:79%vs62%P〈0.05;),且较福辛普利具有更强的减低清晨2:00~8:00血压的作用(P〈0.05)。坎地沙坦不良反应发生率较少。结论 坎地沙坦治疗轻中度原发性高血压安全有效,耐受性好,可持续24h理想的控制血压。 Objective To investigate the clinical safety and efficacy of candesartan in the treatment of patient with mild to moderate hypertension. Methods One hundred thirty patients with mild to moderate hypertension were randomly divided into candesartan ( n = 66, 4- 8mg/d ) or fosinopril( n - 64, 10- 20mg/d ) for 20 weeks, Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was undertaken before and after the treatment. 24 hours mean blood pressure , trough/peak ratio, BP in 2:00- 8:00AM, effective rate, and side effect were evaluated. Results Both SBP and DBP decreased in two groups after the treatment. The effective rates were 74 % in eandesartan group and 73 % in fosinopril group. The trough/peak ratio in candesartan group was higher than in fosinopril group (SBP79% vs 63%, DBP 79% vs 62% ). Reduction of mean SBP and DBP in candesartan group was greater than that in fosinopril group during 2:00-8:00AM. Candesartan was well tolerated. Conclusion Candesartan is safe and effective in treatment of mild to moderate hypertension.
作者 何兆祺 易春
出处 《中国心血管杂志》 2006年第3期177-179,共3页 Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine
关键词 高血压 坎地沙坦 福辛普利 Hypertension Candesartan Fosinopril
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1唐显军.坎地沙坦——血管紧张素受体拮抗剂的研究进展[J].心血管病学进展,2004,25(3):172-175. 被引量:33
  • 2KlonerRA, Weinberger M, Pool JL, et al. Comparative effects of candesartan cilexetil and amlodipine in patients with mild systemic hypertension. Comparison of candesartan and amlodipine for safety, tolerability and efficacy (CASTLE) study investigators[J]. Am J Cardiol,2001,87:727-731.
  • 3柏瑾,诸骏仁,蔡绳,唐斌,范维琥,郭冀珍,郭静萱,沈潞华,柯元南,陆再英.替米沙坦治疗轻中度高血压的临床疗效和安全性——多中心随机对照临床试验[J].中华心血管病杂志,2002,30(12):738-742. 被引量:55
  • 4Pitt B, Poole-Wilson PA, Segal R, et al. Effect of losartan compared with captopril in mortality in patient with symptomatic heart failure: randomized trial: the losartan heart failure survival study[J]. Lancent, 2000, 355:1582-1587.
  • 5Zannad F, Matzinger A, Larche J. Trough/peak ratio of once daily angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium antagonists[J]. Am J Hypertens, 1996,9:633-643.
  • 6Eguchi K, Kario K, Shimada K. Comparsion of candesartan with lisinopril on ambulatory blood pressure and morning surge in patients with systemic hypertension[J]. Am J Cardiol,2003,9:621-624.
  • 7Smith DH, Matzek KM, Kempthorne-Rawson J.Dose response and safety of telmisarten in patientsnwith mild to moderate hypertension[J]. J Clin Pharmacol, 2000,40 : 1380-1390.
  • 8Gleiter CH, Morike KE. Clinical pharmacokinetics of candesartan[J]. Clin Pharmacokinet, 2002,41:7-17.
  • 9Lacourciere Y. The incidence cough: A comparison of lisinopril placebo and telmisartan a novel angiotensin Ⅱ antagonist[J ]. Int J Clin Pract, 1999,53 : 1-5.

二级参考文献9

  • 1Siragy H. Angiotensin II receptor blockers: review of the binding characteristics. Am J Cardiol, 1999, 84: 3S-8S.
  • 2Neutel JM, Smith DHG. Dose response ane antihypertensive efficacy of the AT1 receptor antagonist telmisartan in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Adv Ther, 1998, 15: 206-217.
  • 3Myers MG. Suggested guidelines for determining the trough-to-peak ratio of antihypertensive drugs. Am J Hypertens, 1996, 9: 76S-82S.
  • 4Mallion JM, Siche JP, Lacourciere Y, et al. ABPM comparison of antihypertensive profiles of the selective angiotensin II receptor antagonists telmisartan and losartan in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. J Hum Hypertens, 1999, 13: 657-664.
  • 5Lipicky RJ. Trough/peak ratio: the rationale behind the United States Food and Drug Administration reco mmendations. J Hypertens, 1994, 12(Suppl 8): S17-S19.
  • 6Zannad F, Matzinger A, Larche J. Trough/peak ratios of once-daily angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium antagonists. Am J Hypertens, 1996, 9: 633-643.
  • 7Muller JE, Ludmer PL, Willich SN, et al. Circadian variation in the frequency of sudden cardiac death. Circulation, 1987, 75: 131-138.
  • 8刘国仗,张宇清.高血压 (10)降压谷/峰比值的方法学及应用中的一些问题[J].中国循环杂志,1997,12(6):401-402. 被引量:9
  • 9景涛,何国祥,刘建平,王耿,吴昊,王海东.血管紧张素II及其受体在血管平滑肌细胞迁移中的作用[J].中国病理生理杂志,2002,18(2):143-146. 被引量:23

共引文献86

同被引文献29

引证文献4

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部