期刊文献+

从“头”认知——转喻、隐喻与一词多义现象研究 被引量:212

Cognition from “Head”—— Research on Polysemy with Metonymy and Metaphor
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 转喻和隐喻是词义延伸的两种主要方式。本文以英汉head(头)为语料,从认知转喻和隐喻的思维角度分析一词多义现象。研究发现:(1)隐喻在词义延伸中发挥的作用大于转喻;(2)在词义延伸中有两种思维结构:一是以邻近性关系为基础的“部分代整体”的转喻思维结构;另一个是以事物相似性为基础的隐喻性联想思维结构。转喻呈连锁状延伸,隐喻呈辐射状延伸。两种思维结构相互交叉,出现连续统的现象;(3)当词义从本义向转喻、隐喻方向延伸的时候,离本义越远,修辞性就越强;(4)英语和汉语在词义延伸过程中,认知思维部分相同。 Metonymy and Metaphor are two major types of word meaning extension. This article is about the research on polysemy based on cognitive metonymy and metaphor by analysis of "Head" both in English and in Chinese. The findings are as follows. 1) Metaphor plays a more important role than metonymy in the extension of word meaning. 2) There are two ways of thinking in the extension of word meaning: metonymical thinking based on contiguity and metaphorical thinking based on similarity. Metonymy extends in chains, yet metaphor in radial. These two ways of thinking are llke points on a continuum. 3) when the the word meaning in extension is farther from the original mean ing, it is more figurative. 4) Parts of cognition are the same for Chinese and English.
作者 李瑛 文旭
出处 《外语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第3期1-5,共5页 Foreign Language Education
基金 四川省教育厅重点研究课题(项目批准号:SA03-057) 国家社科基金项目(项目批准号:03BYY017)阶段成果。
关键词 多义词 认知转喻 认知隐喻 poiysemy cognitive metonymy cognitive metaphor
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Beijoint, H. Modern Lexicography: An Introduction [M]. Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press, 2000.
  • 2de Saussure, F. Course in General Linguistics[M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2003.
  • 3Dirven, R. Metonymy and metaphor: different mental strategies of conception [A]. In Dirven. R. & Poring, R. (eds.),Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast[C]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 3002.
  • 4Goossens, L. Metaphtonymy: the interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action[A]. In Mey, J. L, Parret, O. (eds,), By Word of Mouth[C]. Belgium: University of Antwerp, 1995:159-174.
  • 5Goossens, L. Metaphtonymy: the interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action[A]. In Dirven. R. Poring, R. (eds.), Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast[C]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 2002:349-368.
  • 6Lakoff, G. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things[M]. Chicagn:The University of Chicago Press, 1987.
  • 7Levi-Strauss, C. Structulal Anthropology[M]. (translated by Jacobson and Brooke Grundfest Scheoepf). Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1972.
  • 8Nogales, P. D. Metaphorically Speaking[M]. CSLI Pubtieations, 1999.
  • 9Radden, G, & Koveeses, Z. Towards a theory of metonymy[A].In Panther, K. & Radden. G. (eds.), Metonymy in Laguage and Thought[C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1999.
  • 10Rosch, E. Principles of categorization[A]. In Rosch. E. & Lioyd, B. (eds.), Cognition and Categorization[C]. Hillsdale. N. J. : Erlbaum. 1078.

二级参考文献17

  • 1崔延强.关于亚里士多德所理解的“范畴”一词考释[J].江淮论坛,1993(1):26-28. 被引量:4
  • 2陆宗达,王宁.古汉语词义研究——关于古代书面汉语词义引申的规律[J].辞书研究,1981(2):31-42. 被引量:20
  • 3吴世雄,陈维振.论语义范畴的家族相似性[J].外语教学与研究,1996,28(4):14-19. 被引量:74
  • 4维特根斯坦 李步楼译.哲学研究[M].北京:商务印书馆,1996.31、7.
  • 5Labov, W The Boundaries of Word and Their Meanings[A]. Bailey & Shuy. New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English[C]. Washington:Georgetown University Press, 1973.
  • 6Rosch, E Cognitive Representation of Semantic.Categories[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology,1975, (4).
  • 7Rosch, Eleanor & Barbara B Lloyd. Cognition and Categorization[C]. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1978.
  • 8Lakoff, George. Woman, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind[M] Chicago: Chicago University of Chicago Press, 1987.
  • 9Wittgenstein, L Philosophical Investigation[M]. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1953.
  • 10Waldron, T E Principle of Language and Mind [M]. London: Routledge & kegan Paul, 1985.

共引文献150

同被引文献1323

引证文献212

二级引证文献349

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部